From: Mikael Djurfeldt <djurfeldt@nada.kth.se>
Cc: Joris van der Hoeven <TeXmacs@math.u-psud.fr>
Subject: Re: PLEASE: debugging embedded guile code
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 15:52:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xy73ck2bufy.fsf@nada.kth.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3znmd8g72.fsf@laruns.ossau.uklinux.net> (Neil Jerram's message of "26 Apr 2003 15:51:45 +0100")
Neil Jerram <neil@ossau.uklinux.net> writes:
> Dale> The answer is lazy-catch. [...]
In fact, it's better to use
scm_internal_stack_catch
in which case some of the complexity disappears.
> I'm curious about this because the question of error handling keeps
> popping up and I'm wondering whether our current solution is good
> enough. (With a strong suspicion that it isn't.)
One obvious reason is that there is no documentation. We should
really have a simple example of how to enable debugging from C and how
to use scm_internal_stack_catch to print out all error information.
Regarding looking for new/better solutions: It's probably good to
follow closely what happens with regard to error handling in the SRFI
process. Relevant SRFIs are, at least, 34, 18 (exception handlers,
`raise' in thread context), 23, 35, 36.
Mikael
_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-28 13:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.GSO.3.96.1030209200016.26546A-100000@anh>
2003-02-25 14:19 ` PLEASE: debugging embedded guile code Joris van der Hoeven
2003-02-25 14:36 ` Dale P. Smith
2003-04-26 14:51 ` Neil Jerram
2003-04-26 16:40 ` Bruce Korb
2003-04-26 19:12 ` Neil Jerram
2003-04-26 20:13 ` Bruce Korb
2003-04-27 20:49 ` Neil Jerram
2003-04-27 21:57 ` Bruce Korb
2003-04-28 15:54 ` Paul Jarc
2003-04-28 16:07 ` Bruce Korb
2003-04-28 19:21 ` Neil Jerram
2003-04-28 20:06 ` Bruce Korb
2003-04-28 20:58 ` Neil Jerram
2003-05-16 17:19 ` Bruce Korb
2003-05-16 19:23 ` Neil Jerram
2003-05-16 20:27 ` Bruce Korb
2003-05-16 21:21 ` Rob Browning
2003-05-16 21:56 ` Bruce Korb
2003-05-17 0:31 ` Bruce Korb
2003-05-17 2:33 ` Bruce Korb
2003-05-19 15:00 ` Paul Jarc
2003-04-28 13:52 ` Mikael Djurfeldt [this message]
2003-04-28 19:26 ` Neil Jerram
2003-04-30 0:13 ` SRFI 34 Neil Jerram
2003-05-17 0:45 ` Marius Vollmer
2003-05-17 9:39 ` Neil Jerram
2003-05-17 20:36 ` Marius Vollmer
2004-03-07 18:34 ` Neil Jerram
2003-04-26 14:45 ` PLEASE: debugging embedded guile code Neil Jerram
[not found] <Pine.GSO.4.33.0304261706460.1619-100000@sunanh>
2003-04-26 15:34 ` Neil Jerram
2003-04-26 15:40 ` Joris van der Hoeven
2003-04-26 19:30 ` Neil Jerram
2003-04-27 8:40 ` Joris van der Hoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xy73ck2bufy.fsf@nada.kth.se \
--to=djurfeldt@nada.kth.se \
--cc=TeXmacs@math.u-psud.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).