From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mikael Djurfeldt Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: min, max and nans Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2003 18:03:38 +0200 Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <87ade1t1p7.fsf@zip.com.au> <87d6ih5okm.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <87smqxl1yq.fsf@zip.com.au> <87adcxkepj.fsf@zip.com.au> <87smqo7ks4.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> Reply-To: djurfeldt@nada.kth.se NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1054917183 1010 80.91.224.249 (6 Jun 2003 16:33:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 16:33:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 06 18:33:01 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19OK7p-00009i-00 for ; Fri, 06 Jun 2003 18:31:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19OK92-00083Y-SU for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Jun 2003 12:32:48 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19OK8k-00082g-JD for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jun 2003 12:32:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19OJjF-0000dM-US for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jun 2003 12:06:10 -0400 Original-Received: from kvast.blakulla.net ([213.212.20.77]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19OJhw-0000Qj-RC for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jun 2003 12:04:48 -0400 Original-Received: from dyna224-225.nada.kth.se ([130.237.224.225] helo=witch ident=mail) by kvast.blakulla.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 19OJhp-0006UL-00; Fri, 06 Jun 2003 18:04:41 +0200 Original-Received: from mdj by witch with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19OJgp-0002KK-00; Fri, 06 Jun 2003 18:03:39 +0200 Original-To: Marius Vollmer In-Reply-To: <87smqo7ks4.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> (Marius Vollmer's message of "05 Jun 2003 14:48:11 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) Original-cc: djurfeldt@nada.kth.se X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:2504 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:2504 Marius Vollmer writes: > Kevin Ryde writes: > >> I made this change. Actually, I had a bit of a brain fade and added >> the tests the other day, but not the code. > > :-) I noticed because the snapshots didn't build successfully, but I > thought I'd give you a day or two before sending you the build log... > > Should I make the build logs available as well? In what form? For a > short time, they were posted to guile-cvs@gnu.org. In my opinion, the idea of sending build logs at failure (not when Guile compiles and tests OK) to guile-cvs@gnu.org is an excellent idea. If I have at any time been critical against it, it was because it is a good idea to start off with no build failures so that people feel motivated to fix things. M _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel