From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] [mingw]: Have compiled-file-name produce valid names. Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 15:47:25 +0200 Organization: AvatarAcademy.nl Message-ID: References: <1297784103-18322-1-git-send-email-janneke-list@xs4all.nl> <1297784103-18322-3-git-send-email-janneke-list@xs4all.nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1305899260 25086 80.91.229.12 (20 May 2011 13:47:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 13:47:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: Andy Wingo Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 20 15:47:35 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QNQ3B-0006Ms-3y for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 May 2011 15:47:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58262 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QNQ3A-0006JV-LR for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 May 2011 09:47:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:34139) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QNQ39-0006JQ-0L for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 May 2011 09:47:31 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QNQ37-0007f0-Ks for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 May 2011 09:47:30 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp-vbr5.xs4all.nl ([194.109.24.25]:1125) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QNQ37-0007eu-8t for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 May 2011 09:47:29 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (peder.onsbrabantnet.nl [88.159.206.46] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-vbr5.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p4KDlQps081597; Fri, 20 May 2011 15:47:28 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from janneke@gnu.org) X-Url: http://AvatarAcademy.nl In-Reply-To: (Andy Wingo's message of "Fri, 29 Apr 2011 19:16:25 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110016 (No Gnus v0.16) Emacs/23.3 (cygwin) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: FreeBSD 4.6-4.9 X-Received-From: 194.109.24.25 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:12513 Archived-At: Andy Wingo writes: > I don't much like this approach. Besides mixing in a heuristic on all > machines that is win32-specific, it makes c:/foo.scm collide with > d:/foo.scm in the cache, and fails to also modify load.c which also does > autocompilation in other contexts. Yes, a newer version of this patch also includes load.c and boot-9.scm. Of course the drive letter should be kept. > Is anyone interested in implementing a path library? What's the status/estimate on this -- of course I agree this would be nicer, otoh, a patch to these three files is available that makes guile run on mingw right now. Greetings, Jan --=20 Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar=C2=AE http://AvatarAcademy.nl