unofficial mirror of guile-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Brett <peter@peter-b.co.uk>
To: guile-devel@gnu.org
Cc: guile-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Reconsideration of MinGW work
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:10:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <we1mr5ncydx1.fsf@ssclt003.ee.surrey.ac.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 87fx3tjt3r.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net

Neil Jerram <neil@ossau.uklinux.net> writes:

> I've been making gradual progress on MinGW cross building, but I've
> reached a point where I'm no longer sure that this is worthwhile.  This
> email explains why, and invites comments from anyone interested in this
> - especially from anyone who is really trying to use Guile on Windows.

We get people coming to the gEDA user mailing list on a regular basis
saying, "Where can I find a version of gEDA for Windows?" and the
Windows builds we've put out have been generally well-received.  Since
Guile is one of our core dependencies, lack of Windows support in Guile
would mean that we wouldn't be able to provide a Windows build at all
(we already had massive problems at the start of the Guile 1.8.x series
with GMP portability, or lack thereof, and this meant that it took
almost three years after 1.8 became the supported stable release for us
to be able to stop supporting 1.6).

Cygwin isn't an option, unfortunately; we think it's totally
reasonable for users to want to use the native windowing system, not to
mention the fact that Cygwin is *dog slow*.

I imagine that other applications that link libguile would provide
similar feedback.

Regards,

                                Peter

-- 
Peter Brett <peter@peter-b.co.uk>
Remote Sensing Research Group
Surrey Space Centre





  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-03-22  8:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-21 20:51 Reconsideration of MinGW work Neil Jerram
2010-03-21 21:36 ` Grant Rettke
2010-03-22  1:28 ` Ken Raeburn
2010-03-22 20:10   ` Andy Wingo
2010-03-22 23:38   ` Greg Troxel
2010-03-23  0:04   ` Neil Jerram
2010-03-23  6:59     ` Ken Raeburn
2010-03-23  8:50       ` Andy Wingo
2010-03-28 22:32     ` guile on lemote (was Re: Reconsideration of MinGW work) Ken Raeburn
2010-03-29 21:37       ` guile on lemote Neil Jerram
2010-03-22  8:10 ` Peter Brett [this message]
2010-03-22 20:00   ` Reconsideration of MinGW work Andy Wingo
2010-03-22 20:05     ` Linas Vepstas
2010-03-23  0:20       ` Neil Jerram
2010-03-23  0:13   ` Neil Jerram
2010-03-28 22:26 ` Ludovic Courtès
2010-03-29 20:34   ` Neil Jerram
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-03-21 22:45 carlo.bramix
2010-03-23  0:35 ` Reconsideration " Neil Jerram

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=we1mr5ncydx1.fsf@ssclt003.ee.surrey.ac.uk \
    --to=peter@peter-b.co.uk \
    --cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=guile-user@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).