From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Alexandrov Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: (. wtf?) Date: Mon, 08 May 2023 13:45:43 +0300 Message-ID: References: <110317045333325207.civodul@toot.aquilenet.fr> <5y949ftu.dag@gnui.org> <875y93qrdm.fsf@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="24796"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) Cc: tomas@tuxteam.de, guile-devel@gnu.org To: "Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon May 08 12:46:30 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pvyNx-0006Fa-B3 for guile-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 08 May 2023 12:46:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pvyNe-0001V0-Nd; Mon, 08 May 2023 06:46:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pvyNT-0001UT-MJ for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 May 2023 06:46:03 -0400 Original-Received: from msg-2.mailo.com ([213.182.54.12]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pvyNR-0008D6-Fg for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 May 2023 06:45:59 -0400 Original-Received: by b221-1.in.mailobj.net [192.168.90.21] with ESMTP via ip-20.mailobj.net [213.182.54.20] Mon, 8 May 2023 12:45:49 +0200 (CEST) X-EA-Auth: J1x8tpxz2s8Q3phVaIJ182PwXZHdg4zP4REp4dIS2CShLZvM9bBp8PPV331uAEg3Z/Tq5nbTvLXtRtLS63qYEkpB4qDEkoau In-Reply-To: <875y93qrdm.fsf@web.de> (Arne Babenhauserheide's message of "Mon, 08 May 2023 07:31:11 +0200") OpenPGP: id=525F7E60AD812C2361752BB4C8B0F8548EE7F3E7; url=https://openpgpkey.gnui.org/.well-known/openpgpkey/gnui.org/hu/hr4k5tkxm6shwdc18su4bkm34w3dctjd Mail-Copies-To: always Received-SPF: pass client-ip=213.182.54.12; envelope-from=dag@gnui.org; helo=msg-2.mailo.com X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.lisp.guile.devel:21822 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable "Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" wrote: > If I understood it correctly Yes, thank you. > they Just to clarify: I have no claims to represent anyone=CA=BCs view but my ow= n. Having said that, the fact, that by writing a reader without keeping this v= ery case in mind, you get _this_ behaviour (as @janneke@todon.nl put it) = =E2=80=9Cfor free=E2=80=9D, clearly hints who (Guile/Kawa/Mes or Racket/Che= z/Chicken) aligns with schemey way of minimizing the amount of rules and ex= ceptions in a language better. ;-) --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIMEARYIACsWIQRSX35grYEsI2F1K7TIsPhUjufz5wUCZFjS1w0cZGFnQGdudWku b3JnAAoJEMiw+FSO5/PnPLABAJPUckLD9FKVcIX6XCS+6B0LbBlquewebOjTnmpA QHvbAP9RrtZndtCKsHL8HzvN2UYRv/VLn29SqfsAHsl0NKBaCg== =OMpo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--