"Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" wrote: > If I understood it correctly Yes, thank you. > they Just to clarify: I have no claims to represent anyoneʼs view but my own. Having said that, the fact, that by writing a reader without keeping this very case in mind, you get _this_ behaviour (as @janneke@todon.nl put it) “for free”, clearly hints who (Guile/Kawa/Mes or Racket/Chez/Chicken) aligns with schemey way of minimizing the amount of rules and exceptions in a language better. ;-)