From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Greg Troxel Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: i guess we're frozen & stuff Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:36:25 -0400 Message-ID: References: <8763cuwdkl.fsf@gnu.org> <87hbwerswu.fsf@gnu.org> <87tz0eq89c.fsf@gnu.org> <87my653xo6.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1250096918 11143 80.91.229.12 (12 Aug 2009 17:08:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 17:08:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 12 19:08:31 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MbHJM-0002Qg-3g for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 19:08:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44453 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MbHJJ-0006Nu-JF for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:08:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MbGoU-0005Wl-H2 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:36:34 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MbGoP-0005Nl-57 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:36:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=44431 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MbGoO-0005NY-TX for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:36:28 -0400 Original-Received: from fnord.ir.bbn.com ([192.1.100.210]:63300) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MbGoM-00056r-DA; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:36:26 -0400 Original-Received: by fnord.ir.bbn.com (Postfix, from userid 10853) id 46FCF53E7; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:36:25 -0400 (EDT) X-Hashcash: 1:20:090812:ludo@gnu.org::2o/gBVBaYGeYbsh2:0000036o7 X-Hashcash: 1:20:090812:guile-devel@gnu.org::2o/gBVBaYGeYbsh2:0000000000000000000000000000000000000000006Ae6 In-Reply-To: <87my653xo6.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?=22's?= message of "Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:38:01 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/22.3 (berkeley-unix) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:9089 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=E8s) writes: >> My conclusion so far is that "(void *)0" is a legal value for NULL > > Whether "legal" or not, under-parenthesized expression-like macros are > likely to cause troubles one day or another. > > Thanks for your work with the upstream people! I now have a pointer to something in POSIX 2008 that says expression-like macros have to be parenthesized. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (NetBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkqC74kACgkQ+vesoDJhHiVGUQCeP4ulq3KSVfaEvJb+iLyg+S4g WLgAn2fwglmCICB/YemRWI227YHoBAYA =hm6i -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--