From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Greg Troxel Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: i guess we're frozen & stuff Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 09:08:02 -0400 Message-ID: References: <8763cuwdkl.fsf@gnu.org> <87hbwerswu.fsf@gnu.org> <87tz0eq89c.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1250082509 26492 80.91.229.12 (12 Aug 2009 13:08:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:08:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 12 15:08:21 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MbDYy-0006gX-0p for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:08:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58138 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MbDYv-0000uf-NU for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 09:08:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MbDYp-0000tv-NX for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 09:08:11 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MbDYl-0000sY-UP for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 09:08:11 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50242 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MbDYj-0000sQ-KQ for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 09:08:05 -0400 Original-Received: from fnord.ir.bbn.com ([192.1.100.210]:64552) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MbDYh-0003cV-2G; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 09:08:03 -0400 Original-Received: by fnord.ir.bbn.com (Postfix, from userid 10853) id 361BA53E7; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 09:08:02 -0400 (EDT) X-Hashcash: 1:20:090812:ludo@gnu.org::e2G7Ep6dSr/PHKGU:000000IRw X-Hashcash: 1:20:090812:guile-devel@gnu.org::4bQc/rwT1PS43r22:0000000000000000000000000000000000000000007kdt In-Reply-To: <87tz0eq89c.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?=22's?= message of "Wed, 12 Aug 2009 00:46:07 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/22.3 (berkeley-unix) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:9087 Archived-At: --=-=-= http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-userlevel/2009/08/thread1.html#002545 http://savannah.gnu.org/support/?106973 My conclusion so far is that "(void *)0" is a legal value for NULL (even given as an example in POSIX 2008 glossary), and that just because an expression E evaluates to an integer constant one can not assume that "sizeof E" is valid. gnulib has changed to sizeof(NULL) and I think NetBSD is going to change NULL to add the () as well (to make it less likely people will have trouble, not because the current value is wrong). --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (NetBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkqCvrIACgkQ+vesoDJhHiUt+QCfX7zoRQ66OHHVhxbu9nB2kSBG iWUAn2E42W4dWXrg/WN5EbKoPac1G8Xh =HrQO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--