From: Greg Troxel <gdt@ir.bbn.com>
To: Andy Wingo <wingo@pobox.com>
Cc: guile-devel <guile-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: i guess we're frozen & stuff
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 07:34:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <rmieiria8iv.fsf@fnord.ir.bbn.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3r5vjmp7t.fsf@pobox.com> (Andy Wingo's message of "Mon, 10 Aug 2009 21:41:10 +0200")
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 997 bytes --]
Today's the 10th, we release on the 15th, ergo we're frozen.
What does this mean? Well I think the dilly is that we shouldn't be
pushing to master, except to fix things that don't work at all, and to
update documentation, NEWS, etc.
What if you don't have push access? Well give Guile a try with your
programs, run some benchmarks against 1.9.1, give the tires a good kick.
Sorry, I've been distracted. Is this what we call 'master', and what I
am running autobuilds against, along with the 1.8 branch? I will try to
find time to install libunistring and get it to build.
Have there been recent reports of success of 1.9.x on platforms other
than GNU/Linux? Guile has been quite portable in the past and it's
surely still very close if not there, and it would be a shame if 2.0 had
issues. I realize this is hard for people to test if they don't have
the platform, but it would be really good to have testing on at least
one normal BSD and also Darwin.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 193 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-11 11:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-10 19:41 i guess we're frozen & stuff Andy Wingo
2009-08-10 21:08 ` Mike Gran
2009-08-10 21:16 ` Andy Wingo
2009-08-10 21:37 ` Ludovic Courtès
2009-08-11 11:34 ` Greg Troxel [this message]
2009-08-11 13:59 ` Ken Raeburn
2009-08-11 14:45 ` Ken Raeburn
2009-08-11 15:36 ` Ludovic Courtès
2009-08-11 15:50 ` Ken Raeburn
2009-08-12 22:42 ` Andy Wingo
2009-08-11 15:34 ` Ludovic Courtès
2009-08-12 22:41 ` Andy Wingo
2009-09-16 19:00 ` Andy Wingo
2009-09-25 21:59 ` Ken Raeburn
2009-09-26 15:45 ` Mike Gran
2009-09-26 22:36 ` Ken Raeburn
2009-09-26 23:11 ` Mike Gran
2009-09-26 21:02 ` Ludovic Courtès
2009-09-26 22:26 ` Ken Raeburn
2009-09-27 9:10 ` Ludovic Courtès
2009-09-27 10:01 ` Ken Raeburn
2009-09-28 7:39 ` Ludovic Courtès
2009-09-28 17:22 ` Neil Jerram
2009-09-28 18:48 ` Ludovic Courtès
2009-09-28 22:42 ` Neil Jerram
2009-09-28 23:21 ` Bug #27457 (“Threads, mutexes, and critical sections”) Ludovic Courtès
2009-09-30 20:59 ` (no subject) Neil Jerram
2009-10-01 17:21 ` Bug #27457 (“Threads, mutexes, and critical sections”) Ludovic Courtès
2009-10-01 21:05 ` (no subject) Neil Jerram
2009-10-01 19:45 ` Bug #27457 (“Threads, mutexes, and critical sections”) Ken Raeburn
2009-10-01 20:44 ` (no subject) Neil Jerram
2009-09-28 23:27 ` i guess we're frozen & stuff Ken Raeburn
2009-09-28 23:08 ` Ken Raeburn
2009-08-26 22:18 ` Neil Jerram
2009-08-11 12:29 ` Greg Troxel
2009-08-11 15:48 ` Mike Gran
2009-08-11 15:54 ` Ludovic Courtès
2009-08-11 16:13 ` Mike Gran
2009-08-11 17:01 ` Ludovic Courtès
2009-08-11 17:49 ` Mike Gran
2009-08-11 17:04 ` Greg Troxel
2009-08-11 18:14 ` Ken Raeburn
2009-08-11 20:34 ` Ludovic Courtès
2009-08-11 21:58 ` Greg Troxel
2009-08-11 22:46 ` Ludovic Courtès
2009-08-12 13:08 ` Greg Troxel
2009-08-12 14:38 ` Ludovic Courtès
2009-08-12 16:36 ` Greg Troxel
2009-08-11 18:15 ` Ludovic Courtès
2009-08-11 18:17 ` Greg Troxel
2009-08-11 20:26 ` Ludovic Courtès
2009-08-11 22:07 ` Greg Troxel
2009-08-11 17:24 ` Greg Troxel
2009-08-11 19:10 ` i18n issues on NetBSD Ludovic Courtès
2009-08-11 22:05 ` Greg Troxel
2009-08-11 22:58 ` Ludovic Courtès
2009-08-11 17:46 ` i guess we're frozen & stuff Juhani Viheräkoski
2009-08-11 18:01 ` Mike Gran
2009-08-11 20:31 ` Ludovic Courtès
2009-08-11 13:27 ` Greg Troxel
2009-08-11 13:39 ` unsigned char confusion Greg Troxel
2009-08-11 15:23 ` Mike Gran
2009-08-11 17:05 ` i guess we're frozen & stuff Ken Raeburn
2009-08-11 20:27 ` Ludovic Courtès
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=rmieiria8iv.fsf@fnord.ir.bbn.com \
--to=gdt@ir.bbn.com \
--cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=wingo@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).