From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Greg Troxel Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Guile 2.x and `pkg-config' Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2009 17:41:36 -0400 Message-ID: References: <873a80spl8.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1249854116 11506 80.91.229.12 (9 Aug 2009 21:41:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 21:41:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 09 23:41:49 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MaG9D-0003dv-Va for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 09 Aug 2009 23:41:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53752 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MaG9D-0006iX-E6 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 09 Aug 2009 17:41:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MaG9B-0006iS-18 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Aug 2009 17:41:45 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MaG95-0006iF-Us for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Aug 2009 17:41:44 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49204 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MaG95-0006iC-SA for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Aug 2009 17:41:39 -0400 Original-Received: from fnord.ir.bbn.com ([192.1.100.210]:50851) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MaG93-0005fI-MK; Sun, 09 Aug 2009 17:41:37 -0400 Original-Received: by fnord.ir.bbn.com (Postfix, from userid 10853) id F009C53E7; Sun, 9 Aug 2009 17:41:36 -0400 (EDT) X-Hashcash: 1:20:090809:guile-devel@gnu.org::8MeVf3uKYjetJGFJ:0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000OHk X-Hashcash: 1:20:090809:ludo@gnu.org::28lest8aUY0dUip9:00000935d In-Reply-To: <873a80spl8.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?=22's?= message of "Sun, 09 Aug 2009 22:24:19 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/22.3 (berkeley-unix) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:9046 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=E8s) writes: > A recent thread on `guile-user' [0] raises an important concern: what > should we do with `guile-1.8.pc' when 2.x is out? > > How about shipping `guile-1.8.pc' for compatibility, along with > `guile.pc' (which would then become the Right One), both with > "Version:=A02.0"? > > Thoughts? That sounds reasonable. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (NetBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkp/QpAACgkQ+vesoDJhHiVJqgCeKYO85oGhyR2cr+orNfKuW5zS 2JQAn3+T0AWMfX9rqfraMQL/M7WAG28S =ds20 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--