From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Alexandrov Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: (. wtf?) Date: Mon, 08 May 2023 13:53:31 +0300 Message-ID: References: <110317045333325207.civodul@toot.aquilenet.fr> <5y949ftu.dag@gnui.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="30136"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon May 08 12:54:11 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pvyVO-0007cW-AA for guile-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 08 May 2023 12:54:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pvyUw-0002Vt-TH; Mon, 08 May 2023 06:53:43 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pvyUt-0002VQ-RV for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 May 2023 06:53:40 -0400 Original-Received: from msg-4.mailo.com ([213.182.54.15]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pvyUr-0002J5-OH for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 May 2023 06:53:39 -0400 Original-Received: by b221-4.in.mailobj.net [192.168.90.24] with ESMTP via ip-20.mailobj.net [213.182.54.20] Mon, 8 May 2023 12:53:35 +0200 (CEST) X-EA-Auth: lOOWDu7nwei4YsGPH2YbvVHMUKHclRrV18U88CrThAcnaofFoS+1VYRfCv+DlzmXwZXkmV9PnE188jZIdei0YZnD+Vzsvkw+ In-Reply-To: (tomas@tuxteam.de's message of "Mon, 8 May 2023 06:32:07 +0200") OpenPGP: id=525F7E60AD812C2361752BB4C8B0F8548EE7F3E7; url=https://openpgpkey.gnui.org/.well-known/openpgpkey/gnui.org/hu/hr4k5tkxm6shwdc18su4bkm34w3dctjd Mail-Copies-To: always Received-SPF: pass client-ip=213.182.54.15; envelope-from=dag@gnui.org; helo=msg-4.mailo.com X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.lisp.guile.devel:21823 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain wrote: >> it is required for compatibility with elisp > > Is it Guile's incompatibility with Emacs Lisp As of now, they are compatible in that regard. > (no wonder: the first is a Scheme, the second a Lisp: they are related, but pretty different) Yet, but if I am not mistaken, =scheme= and =elisp= share the bits of reader, that are responsible for the subject. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIMEARYIACsWIQRSX35grYEsI2F1K7TIsPhUjufz5wUCZFjUqw0cZGFnQGdudWku b3JnAAoJEMiw+FSO5/PnPZkA/RnoZOLlOu7EwbKWiFemPEH3mt6qkvd6tKArjf86 EKOMAQD51S0mskJ6cajUp0uB+2bcOZuvjudSAC9cIf4zL9UeBA== =2W0C -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--