From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: more compilation failures: -DSCM_DEBUG_TYPING_STRICTNESS=2 Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:20:31 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1253129838 8513 80.91.229.12 (16 Sep 2009 19:37:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:37:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel To: Ken Raeburn Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 16 21:37:11 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Mo0JT-0003Ii-4E for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:37:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45731 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mo0JS-00087I-Kd for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:37:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mo0J7-0007xT-Cn for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:36:49 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mo0J2-0007vU-9x for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:36:48 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60361 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mo0J2-0007vM-4E for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:36:44 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:60549 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mo0J1-0000to-Qk for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:36:43 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EB5F355FA; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:36:43 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=f83gyDoLiYKCeuShtjXW7xx3ipo=; b=uD+qAg GOJJJMYPK0bELgUCpgSrCA6PsgXpQrbvZcpQ+B144JYFfZhHyxRP4DiLEovy+H1v xJ9lCLFX5P7UHWiswDAMRRBk/JFRG0hcBbrjj+xj+e7LrUph8un6AhTW8H9vyy2B PVqqmNXYiAP/yVXnON0wIBZBiF6ajgOSZQEH8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=RgTUZTZ9XK0PpBZma2qgtdNhiBfbem7U Z3E1xK8MqWm8sV3p8YkrCq/7JXHEwEgk9KGzXR+FzXVWlOo4VgDxBtdn+09Lokx1 En+9bPk0qmxzSPxKTayQKDpyDsfRXmG8S+OidfBIyNoNzsIz8k+aqSuW5dqd1Rji nYMt6YzO228= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E80C355F9; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:36:42 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote (unknown [83.32.70.123]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C5A4C355F8; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:36:40 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Ken Raeburn's message of "Tue, 1 Sep 2009 02:26:36 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 42E4DB9A-A2F8-11DE-B3A1-A13518FFA523-02397024!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:9330 Archived-At: On Tue 01 Sep 2009 08:26, Ken Raeburn writes: > On Sep 1, 2009, at 02:23, Ken Raeburn wrote: >> I can clean some of this up trivially -- SCM_PACK/SCM_UNPACK as >> needed, change == to scm_is_eq. The initializers make it slightly >> less trivial, and I can imagine different courses of action. > > Okay, not quite so trivial as I blithely asserted. > > It looks like the eval code is going to be annoying too All this will be gone within a month, hopefully. Further details to come. I don't see it as such a big problem to play "fast and loose" with types, honestly... one day we'll have native compilation, and it's all just words there. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/