From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Can `make tags' generate tags for Scheme source, as well as C? Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 19:46:09 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87d3skxjd6.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87ocbzf4xn.fsf@gnu.org> <87pqvphb4d.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87r5g5h99i.fsf@newton.homeunix.net> <87lj64pfto.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <877hhoe5an.fsf@newton.homeunix.net> <8739sbehjl.fsf@newton.homeunix.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1286905467 32033 80.91.229.12 (12 Oct 2010 17:44:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 17:44:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org, Neil Jerram To: "Jose A. Ortega Ruiz" Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 12 19:44:24 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P5itj-0001hK-Ea for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 19:44:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35600 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P5iti-000189-Pn for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 13:44:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=52954 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P5is9-0008MR-BC for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 13:42:46 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P5is8-0005iy-7j for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 13:42:45 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:65439 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P5is8-0005iu-5E; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 13:42:44 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70E62882C7; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 13:42:43 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=IldBqRCqTmo2D6xpfe9UZmsqIiQ=; b=DtVd9E f0CvWPRzyThFUYmppgLCl4cN3ezBd/ORjcHW3cyF008Yv/eszC1LN1x3SWogOE89 BfmCP7khA8edmNfTpnTpw24yo/cUIox3qnVDmrOweZVDJJVxFDAYDckPrBlAIcyO nUq95Rk/ef4Jtd6tSRpqPFW9utQ/tUDTd0nCo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=xZWKK6P5tjWXkvtTprqWhukjb7QmNUfI l3ev12pAjrEPtkbHlzMs++sOzv5a9RAQuaq48GPXpp04VKFH7syhE0aAVqGRMIVD UIK9/2BXq65+PKeyJ5jXvlUUNd/4fqXSJoxxV+dmisT0zlIvS84Cbv4VOWHZfa1c PPLTLyfba/4= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21710882C4; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 13:42:41 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [79.151.216.229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5D81A882C2; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 13:42:38 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <8739sbehjl.fsf@newton.homeunix.net> (Jose A. Ortega Ruiz's message of "Tue, 12 Oct 2010 14:12:30 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 1C957A76-D628-11DF-87F9-030CEE7EF46B-02397024!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:11039 Archived-At: On Tue 12 Oct 2010 14:12, "Jose A. Ortega Ruiz" writes: > "No Geiser REPL for this buffer (try M-x run-geiser)" Yes, I get this at times. But why tell me what to do? Why not do it for me, with my permission? A single keypress keeps you in flow. >>> I don't think it's a good a idea to load modules behind the user's >>> back. >> >> Could it ask? :-) > > It could, but it's a lot of work :-) It can also be annoying to keep > answering questions: i'd need to keep track of whether i've already > asked, options would be needed to deactivate the behaviour, to make > auto-loading the default... more work... I think i'd need one or two > more users feeling the need for this feature (i don't) :-). Fair enough :) Andy -- http://wingolog.org/