From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Cross-compiling Guile 2.0 Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2011 21:43:34 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87hbbhbb99.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87y64sa4ut.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1299449919 19568 80.91.229.12 (6 Mar 2011 22:18:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2011 22:18:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: Neil Jerram Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 06 23:18:33 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PwMHF-0001NV-3R for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Mar 2011 23:18:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46903 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PwLO0-0000Fb-34 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Mar 2011 16:21:08 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=60476 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PwLHf-0005Z8-Gb for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Mar 2011 16:14:40 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PwKnh-0003pA-VI for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Mar 2011 15:43:39 -0500 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:46461 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PwKnh-0003p1-Sr for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Mar 2011 15:43:37 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1DE04911; Sun, 6 Mar 2011 15:45:01 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=mBa8/VLZ1aI1vA2AuNsuLkCFkcY=; b=CdrtVr oNFUCk00jD3pIDPlFCrinXCu1rzitqatCgCPgakBf1x6HiAxn8wZgCfbJKrYJdyA 8PiBhUOGDDnaxFEUXIpDTInY+VtckSW8sC1fyOIDG2MUWiQTIHnRJS4/vWo3EZhj rwXOx5xKEos/SOg7RTgI4Cirwb3btc50PdFig= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=i1B1azMSsn3xpDASAjU+C0k4KgLvp191 zpGHo1NKdvzh29PvPsrxD9N6mSGXyHEo8bsI6DQ6AiBxBdiy3t2BIkmCdCqhc34X ZyXjZ8Kj6JOo1kuaatjPAzy2FCnRvAqX2NynS7Wc2VQzFmjkraPsAHVEkMu2dJtJ qntrsHKBUGk= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81DDA4910; Sun, 6 Mar 2011 15:45:00 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B4FC8490F; Sun, 6 Mar 2011 15:44:58 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87y64sa4ut.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> (Neil Jerram's message of "Sun, 06 Mar 2011 11:03:06 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 9ADC7DEA-4832-11E0-A7A5-AF401E47CF6F-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 64.74.157.62 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:11794 Archived-At: Hi, On Sun 06 Mar 2011 12:03, Neil Jerram writes: > What architectural dependencies are there in the .go format? Only endianness and word size. Of course a macro could check something about the system at expansion-time, for example a value in a header; and there are things like the mapping of "long" to int32 or int64 in foreign.c. But I guess anything that explicitly depends on such things should know about cross-compilation. Cheers, Andy -- http://wingolog.org/