From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Unicode general categories Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 11:31:03 +0100 Message-ID: References: <2bc5f8210912232146s976fb0cif6d1968d068e42ec@mail.gmail.com> <508814.4641.qm@web37905.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <2bc5f8210912240910q6a2c1c5du9f2c20977e39b29@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1261999522 4777 80.91.229.12 (28 Dec 2009 11:25:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 11:25:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel To: Julian Graham Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 28 12:25:15 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NPDiq-0004Rs-3d for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 12:25:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35349 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NPDiq-0000Mo-8S for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 06:25:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NPDhb-0007pq-Vf for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 06:23:56 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NPDhX-0007mQ-AL for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 06:23:55 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34036 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NPDhW-0007m7-Vh for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 06:23:51 -0500 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:44218 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NPDhW-00056V-Us for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 06:23:51 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65815AA46A; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 06:23:50 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=4p/Vl4O2HEF0e9068c/qK8rC4Yw=; b=BJLB0+ E5fDkjajiXhhjBYQIHbAlR4TS0jIc7HWphB8y0SwKsNlCU24FL4I3yMcKzVJkQGV ZVVPZfnoo4LMnyw1Fl5GmYmy8M1VT6al34ksPoUnHMj50Nl5lCtgr8mA+HgHikhX ckZxKe0nOpdYbXTYAF+iN7o85kA7WFK77iUw4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=NWhlUh7c6hiSZqcJWgp1gCKuGWuLRl21 /4WokxVt9j6Rcg8bWk+1xOGUfma3fBsa+qTlOxEXk1ztGLHNAzw73CJ3yRUPDTCn 2FSMa6Un4YRX35A0lfTlNKwbEKib5dKj1Q4KHDJJFEe0b9/8sn5G3KfXR0oJxXXw Qs408nwDRLA= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B2A5AA469; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 06:23:48 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from unquote (unknown [82.123.112.129]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B9B58AA468; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 06:23:44 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <2bc5f8210912240910q6a2c1c5du9f2c20977e39b29@mail.gmail.com> (Julian Graham's message of "Thu, 24 Dec 2009 12:10:44 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 77BDC196-F3A3-11DE-90A1-465EBBB5EC2E-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:9801 Archived-At: On Thu 24 Dec 2009 18:10, Julian Graham writes: > Did we turn off warnings being errors in master? I'm used to having my > builds fail when I'm sloppy. Yes, because we want releases to not have -Werror. But we should (IMO) re-enable -Werror for non-release builds, by default. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/