From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: goops method defined only in derived classes fails to become generic? Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 16:39:24 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1296653688.19670.266.camel@vuurvlieg> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1297438472 6451 80.91.229.12 (11 Feb 2011 15:34:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 15:34:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 11 16:34:26 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pnv0q-0006fx-Oj for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 16:34:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57240 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pnv0q-0001Iw-8C for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:34:24 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=53277 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pnv0l-0001Hu-CE for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:34:20 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pnv0k-00089R-6v for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:34:19 -0500 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:35984 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pnv0k-00089M-2L; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:34:18 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D9AB34C9; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:35:20 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=6/CP/aSl8tG5OQzb3U3q/dE00WI=; b=mKuaHD BwDFaAWbtMQyi/MJdh8nCu28j/zbo6KlVAsxb2yghtKJ7EBp7nbtw4/lvuNJ9N7z 6sDcSZX1WUIc6SUqMfQ6L66+IZl0wGaB0Gt8A/7Vt877wVEcZJmD6GXsrWAupgAi f2mLbWUsf41wY9D5qgxe/NJWTi0mwS8SLWRxc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=dR+02Mjkg1FXULjMtO4B0QQxO31xTENe Qh2hEMVNCXqAfPM/2nrmar2QwVYtiUEdW4X/Q+PBi1Xm/B209DMrCIJwvD8gdHwn JWzvCqz4wqUGSFmBPmQ07utFnhrEl44T3Dp5IPIVR0skqlRUgnHIVijSz6pMfrC+ RMCr6Hth/8s= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 089B534C8; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:35:19 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 544C834C7; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:35:17 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <1296653688.19670.266.camel@vuurvlieg> (Jan Nieuwenhuizen's message of "Wed, 02 Feb 2011 14:34:48 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 87EE5EEC-35F4-11E0-8523-AF401E47CF6F-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 64.74.157.62 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:11557 Archived-At: On Wed 02 Feb 2011 14:34, Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes: > This worked with guile 1.8. Bug or feature? Do you have a test case? Thanks, Andy -- http://wingolog.org/