From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Neil Jerram Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel,gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Around again, and docs lead role Date: 27 Apr 2003 21:56:31 +0100 Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1051477018 25600 80.91.224.249 (27 Apr 2003 20:56:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 20:56:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Guile Development Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 27 22:56:55 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 199tCh-0006ed-00 for ; Sun, 27 Apr 2003 22:56:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 199tDb-0006RY-08 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 27 Apr 2003 16:57:51 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 199tDG-0006Nj-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Apr 2003 16:57:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 199tCb-0005s5-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Apr 2003 16:56:50 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.uklinux.net ([80.84.72.21] helo=s1.uklinux.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 199tCN-0005hs-00; Sun, 27 Apr 2003 16:56:35 -0400 Original-Received: from laruns.ossau.uklinux.net (bts-0192.dialup.zetnet.co.uk [194.247.48.192]) by s1.uklinux.net (8.11.6p2/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h3RKuXJ14589; Sun, 27 Apr 2003 21:56:34 +0100 Original-Received: from laruns.ossau.uklinux.net.ossau.uklinux.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])ESMTP id DFECBDC4D3; Sun, 27 Apr 2003 21:56:31 +0100 (BST) Original-To: Thamer Al-Harbash In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 25 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 Original-cc: Guile Users X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:2223 gmane.lisp.guile.user:1842 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:2223 >>>>> "Thamer" == Thamer Al-Harbash writes: Thamer> My two cents: Thamer> It's a two man job. We need one honest to goodness guile Thamer> developer who has spent a fair amount of time writing the guile Thamer> code (recently) actually write up a series of drafts, and one Thamer> person to edit and make sure the documentation is readable. Thamer> I'd be willing to do edit, review, and fill in the smaller Thamer> parts. I know enough texinfo to do this comfortably. I don't Thamer> think anyone but a developer should actually be writing the Thamer> documentation. guile is a fairly complicated piece of software. Hi Thamer, Thanks for this response. It's slightly at cross purposes to what I was intending, but I think that in itself highlights that we need a better overall picture of the current docs state, and an overall plan for how to finish them. More from me later in the week, but please feel free to contribute more of your own assessment and thoughts. Neil _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel