From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: vm status update Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 22:04:56 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87ab7ys2qi.fsf@gnu.org> <87d4creiyv.fsf@arudy.ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1236720787 3707 80.91.229.12 (10 Mar 2009 21:33:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 21:33:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , guile-devel@gnu.org To: Neil Jerram Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 10 22:34:20 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Lh9aW-0008UM-V1 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 22:34:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48409 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Lh9ZB-0006Ea-8h for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:32:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Lh9Z7-0006DS-MG for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:32:45 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Lh9Z7-0006D6-CK for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:32:45 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56657 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Lh9Z7-0006Cw-3K for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:32:45 -0400 Original-Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:54399 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Lh9Z2-0008MN-6Q; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:32:40 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC10BA0BA2; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:32:39 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote (unknown [79.156.146.153]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C88E3A0BA0; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:32:36 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87d4creiyv.fsf@arudy.ossau.uklinux.net> (Neil Jerram's message of "Sun, 08 Mar 2009 22:40:56 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.91 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: FB54FFBC-0DBA-11DE-8E67-CFA5EBB1AA3C-02397024!a-sasl-fastnet.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:8254 Archived-At: On Sun 08 Mar 2009 23:40, Neil Jerram writes: > ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > >>> Anyway, that's where I am. Bug-wise we still have a bug in backtraces, >>> which I need to pin down at some point, and update docs -- but generally >>> speaking we're mergeable. What do people think, should I be working on >>> master at some point? >> >> Sure. Neil: what do you think? > > No problem, I'm happy for Andy to merge now. Great, I'll get to this within a week or so. >> Looking at `vm', it's been sometime >> since the last merge with `master', so it'd be worth checking that >> things still work. > > I guess that would mean merging master into vm first, and checking > that, then merging vm into master. Yep. Cheers, Andy --=20 http://wingolog.org/