From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Article on VM's Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 09:50:43 +0100 Message-ID: References: <3ae3aa421002081400i6f16517br94bf187d2d8d65d@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1265705382 17867 80.91.229.12 (9 Feb 2010 08:49:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 08:49:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Guile Development To: linasvepstas@gmail.com Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 09 09:49:35 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nelmo-0002GP-9k for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 09:49:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52391 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nelml-0007jP-D0 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:49:31 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Nelmi-0007jJ-Qy for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:49:28 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=36978 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nelmi-0007j6-Ay for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:49:28 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Nelme-0000Zo-8A for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:49:28 -0500 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:55660 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Nelme-0000ZS-1x for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:49:24 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 589BB982A4; Tue, 9 Feb 2010 03:49:17 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=qHuyvLAwuOiF4j9LgcCikSbqgqM=; b=l9k4W6 bcXJDmMEVbKoWY60YvxeoB4Qh7MSn142jdz1p4mtuXFU/ukkgE48vXerh03+5Od4 aoukmQ5oVV5962tWimtFYkvb5n/Mszao1b6JdaqgY4b7q2ad7W+zMBZBvXOZkz/m DiuZVlIfraB63F/zSTesLZCM/OByCCybKhbug= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=d1p6ViEdOiFgfyyU7TZgXtI7TnDP5k4Y 4V7M4pBLk+HKjZWxDlzEjpB2hV+snY8+arloqoJB+kA2dTKfwcph2ivbUFYFRJ22 GjwkvfgL3pD4izN9WcnM/0CVj+R3aW2O0zWJSbZ1E6j/MJsDAFo1UGHsEJu1eOh2 n0cBWgz+vYQ= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45DB2982A3; Tue, 9 Feb 2010 03:49:16 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from unquote (unknown [80.24.4.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A456A982A2; Tue, 9 Feb 2010 03:49:14 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <3ae3aa421002081400i6f16517br94bf187d2d8d65d@mail.gmail.com> (Linas Vepstas's message of "Mon, 8 Feb 2010 16:00:09 -0600") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 0100C1D0-1558-11DF-95C6-6AF7ED7EF46B-02397024!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:9965 Archived-At: On Mon 08 Feb 2010 23:00, Linas Vepstas writes: > I just tripped over > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_application_virtual_machines > and noticed that guile-1.9 is notable in its absence > from the list... For the point of view of good advertising > for guile, and drumming up new users/maintainers, it might > be good to get listed there. I'd add text myself, but am > more or less totally ignorant of the topic ... Interesting link. Someone should take up the task of "wikipedia gardener" for Guile :) Andy -- http://wingolog.org/