From: Andy Wingo <wingo@pobox.com>
To: Noah Lavine <noah.b.lavine@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>, guile-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] First batch of numerics changes
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 16:55:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3wrlpc9ba.fsf@unquote.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinsNcaiVc0CCE8UuD1a=31f1VPL-TzeWzzH=+Dc@mail.gmail.com> (Noah Lavine's message of "Fri, 28 Jan 2011 09:44:13 -0500")
On Fri 28 Jan 2011 15:44, Noah Lavine <noah.b.lavine@gmail.com> writes:
> I hope to not derail this much (if at all), but I just did some
> checking, and I believe the following proposal was accepted as R7RS'
> integer division functions. So it might be worth making Guile's like
> that if we can.
>
> http://trac.sacrideo.us/wg/wiki/DivisionRiastradh
Good point! I believe *that* was actually the conclusion I came to.
Thank you for reminding me :)
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-28 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-26 16:32 [PATCH] First batch of numerics changes Mark H Weaver
2011-01-26 18:07 ` Mark H Weaver
2011-01-26 22:46 ` Mark H Weaver
2011-01-27 22:06 ` Mark H Weaver
2011-01-28 12:19 ` Andy Wingo
2011-01-29 0:05 ` Mark H Weaver
2011-01-29 11:29 ` Andy Wingo
2011-01-27 22:32 ` Mark H Weaver
2011-01-28 13:46 ` Andy Wingo
2011-01-28 14:44 ` Noah Lavine
2011-01-28 15:55 ` Andy Wingo [this message]
2011-01-29 8:20 ` Mark H Weaver
2011-01-29 17:42 ` Andy Wingo
2011-01-29 20:20 ` Mark H Weaver
2011-01-30 11:48 ` Andy Wingo
2011-01-29 17:50 ` Andy Wingo
2011-01-29 20:36 ` Mark H Weaver
2011-01-29 22:24 ` Mark H Weaver
2011-01-30 6:02 ` Commentary: R6RS div0-and-mod0 vs Taylor's `round/' Mark H Weaver
2011-01-30 11:50 ` [PATCH] First batch of numerics changes Andy Wingo
2011-01-30 12:12 ` Andy Wingo
2011-01-30 16:33 ` Mark H Weaver
2011-01-28 11:41 ` Andy Wingo
2011-01-28 23:36 ` Mark H Weaver
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3wrlpc9ba.fsf@unquote.localdomain \
--to=wingo@pobox.com \
--cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=mhw@netris.org \
--cc=noah.b.lavine@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).