From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Broken Mail Transport Agent at stelco.com.mv Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 13:48:44 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87d3kv9j1r.fsf@netris.org> <878vvj9iw2.fsf@netris.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1303389068 32226 80.91.229.12 (21 Apr 2011 12:31:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 12:31:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: shiyaz@stelco.com.mv, guile-devel@gnu.org To: Mark H Weaver Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 21 14:31:02 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QCt2C-0002cE-Rg for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 14:31:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41148 helo=lists2.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QCt2C-0002vD-D5 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 08:31:00 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:45068) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QCt2A-0002uJ-2g for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 08:30:59 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QCt27-000212-Tr for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 08:30:57 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:53830 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QCt27-00020w-S5 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 08:30:55 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64B6D3CB8; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 08:32:56 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=vd7iLB0BthRkVedUCkyX41Z3djc=; b=udd3JZ xLktG6ORPG+LyqjiJwxQWNZmcgx5EghiT1q2riSL46dJOCksD7ySdy0my51o+yMp bjoJX9lr0zzb7h/XdD3DEds721+gd3hCSUcepecFqm9igXVuGFbr2+9h4traT5Di Y1MlJOnrA8Vj9IJNfjCgYB9nzLLBWrygEFats= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=cqaxlXrNd0XQB1ru6UnF8pURpm1a6pV+ 1euRQKs3mGwbMYvy2Nfq6accvWLjpcrxUASdl+R7aSwqI5jjuJeBUu0FhVQ2xxHg 42Vo0OE56lWaUkRl4nCTFxUhY2IrOGA/BzyFfl69s0+APKeLJjxEjdawQSnfje1/ vzOlU3a1UJM= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B9B43CB4; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 08:32:53 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 640D63CB2; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 08:32:50 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <878vvj9iw2.fsf@netris.org> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Sat, 09 Apr 2011 18:09:33 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 7A3591F8-6C13-11E0-8A0A-E8AB60295C12-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 64.74.157.62 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:12309 Archived-At: On Sun 10 Apr 2011 00:09, Mark H Weaver writes: > postmaster@stelco.com.mv writes: >> This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. >> >> Delivery to the following recipients failed. >> >> shiyaz@stelco.com.mv > > Can one of the guile-devel administrators please disable delivery to the > address above, as would presumably have been done automatically if these > bounces were being sent to the right address? I have now done this; sorry for the delay, there were some issues with the admin password for the list. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/