unofficial mirror of guile-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Wingo <wingo@pobox.com>
To: Julian Graham <joolean@gmail.com>
Cc: guile-devel <guile-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: r6rs incompatibilities
Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 19:15:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3vdahxjkp.fsf@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTin08Cno9VGI940LzUtaKNJtIlfpfrtMzcm0CLDL@mail.gmail.com> (Julian Graham's message of "Fri, 21 May 2010 08:47:33 -0400")

Hi,

On Fri 21 May 2010 14:47, Julian Graham <joolean@gmail.com> writes:

>>  * The R6RS specifies many situations in which a conforming
>>   implementation must signal a specific error. Guile doesn't really
>>   care about that too much -- if a correct R6RS program would not hit
>>   that error, we don't bother checking for it.
>
> In a lot of these cases, that's because our libraries simply re-export
> bindings from Guile's core library or an SRFI.  Instead of changing
> the error-signaling of the original procedures, we could wrap them a
> bit more in the relevant libraries to add argument validation, say, or
> to re-throw Guile's core errors as R6RS exceptions.

Sure; we'll probably take them case-by-case, accomodating where it makes
sense and documenting the incompatibility where it doesn't. It's not
like Guile's exception protocol is particularly well-thought-out :P

Andy
-- 
http://wingolog.org/



  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-21 17:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-21  9:54 r6rs incompatibilities Andy Wingo
2010-05-21 12:47 ` Julian Graham
2010-05-21 17:15   ` Andy Wingo [this message]
2010-05-23 15:35 ` Julian Graham
2010-05-23 16:02   ` Mike Gran
2010-05-23 17:24     ` Julian Graham
2010-05-23 20:52       ` Andy Wingo
2010-05-23 21:26         ` Andy Wingo
2010-05-26 13:02           ` Julian Graham
2010-05-26 13:21             ` Andy Wingo
2010-05-26 16:43               ` Ludovic Courtès
2010-05-27  8:06                 ` Andy Wingo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m3vdahxjkp.fsf@pobox.com \
    --to=wingo@pobox.com \
    --cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=joolean@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).