From: Andy Wingo <wingo@pobox.com>
To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: vm status update
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 18:57:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3tz8dr5zg.fsf@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87hc4dybyk.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic Courtès"'s message of "Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:06:11 +0100")
Hey hey,
On Mon 05 Jan 2009 17:06, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> "Neil Jerram" <neiljerram@googlemail.com> writes:
>
>> Nice. Regarding the merge to master, though,
>>
>> - I think that would imply that the VM is included in the next release
>> series (1.10.x or 2.0.x); is that your intention? (I have no
>> objection!)
>
> No objection either, but... some benchmarking would be really nice.
> :-)
Yes, you're right.
> Also, what's the status of the VM/compiler test suite?
Well, there are larger tests, in that the normal test suite passes with
VM-compiled code (e.g. ice-9 and all that). However the normal test
suite code is interpreted always -- we need to figure out how to run it
with the interpreter and the evaluator.
And there are smaller tests, which test that VM compilation and
execution produces the same result as interpretation. But there are no
unit tests of the compiler itself. Also, these particular tests are not
yet integrated with the main test suite.
Benchmark-wise, there's not much. I am not currently running many
benchmarks, fwiw -- been focusing more on correctness.
So yes, there's still some work to be done.
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-05 17:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-26 17:24 vm status update Andy Wingo
2008-12-28 22:50 ` Neil Jerram
2009-01-05 16:06 ` Ludovic Courtès
2009-01-05 16:45 ` Neil Jerram
2009-01-05 19:53 ` Ludovic Courtès
2009-01-05 17:57 ` Andy Wingo [this message]
2009-01-05 21:03 ` Ludovic Courtès
2009-01-06 9:52 ` Andy Wingo
2009-01-06 14:54 ` Ludovic Courtès
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-03-06 19:52 Andy Wingo
2009-03-06 22:31 ` Ludovic Courtès
2009-03-08 22:40 ` Neil Jerram
2009-03-10 21:04 ` Andy Wingo
2009-02-14 22:32 Andy Wingo
2009-02-16 11:47 ` Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
2009-03-08 11:49 ` Neil Jerram
2009-03-10 21:36 ` Andy Wingo
2009-03-12 20:49 ` Neil Jerram
2009-01-11 17:35 Andy Wingo
2009-01-13 8:05 ` Ludovic Courtès
2008-09-13 15:59 Andy Wingo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3tz8dr5zg.fsf@pobox.com \
--to=wingo@pobox.com \
--cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=ludo@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).