From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: SRFI-1 in Scheme Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 00:27:53 +0200 Message-ID: References: <8739vocnr0.fsf@gnu.org> <87hbk3uj8c.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1279059921 7829 80.91.229.12 (13 Jul 2010 22:25:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 22:25:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 14 00:25:19 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OYnug-0003nW-0a for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 00:25:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50861 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OYnuf-0001aK-Cr for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 18:25:17 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=35759 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OYnub-0001Z1-MI for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 18:25:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OYnua-0002Gl-0Q for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 18:25:13 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:62092 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OYnuZ-0002Gg-Tf; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 18:25:11 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB795C4F91; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 18:25:10 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=+c7dOw7ukba9 D4iixMy17ignIXU=; b=H80CID7Z6iBgvqOrTA277FFt8N98gi1oClKQfpzDzBMK E6IGVM4NkIryifxMNvS+StkJv/a9InB3OlcstqRAdrpdr6p1BnS4C+BLne7UYy9l yM804PUMTOEsO+2YV2yhXMoh0jfx93/SeyJL3yHCUSiPxpV5XnfKygaaDTT8LIE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=NZGx16 hDOv1dtcizLgctXqxhls0mm6fFWJEzusH0I8tMVAbPct16jrOJt8IWSDzSVlkRvx +y5ePCiDztfwuKjAPw/AaDl5zMfUiaW0PACUVgsQT14yRbWPkIe9Gtq405do87HF Kv3ZOHAntBBwgnglhJx6ONSuWLvrGM8rZLsWs= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4303C4F90; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 18:25:09 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [83.44.191.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 430CAC4F8E; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 18:25:08 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87hbk3uj8c.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Wed, 14 Jul 2010 00:09:39 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 7F3AFCA2-8ECD-11DF-9748-9056EE7EF46B-02397024!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:10660 Archived-At: Greets On Wed 14 Jul 2010 00:09, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > Just to make sure, did you read the figures right? With the debug > engine, the slowdown is noticeable. Yes, I saw the numbers :) > AFAICS the only difference between the two engine is VM_USE_HOOKS. > Hooks are only used in (system vm coverage) at this point, so we don=E2= =80=99t > lose much by disabling them. Tracing and call-counting profiling too. They will be used when stepping so= on. >> At the very least, one should be able to switch VMs. > > You mean switch VMs for the code being executed? Yes. > (For code to be > executed than can already be done using =E2=80=98vm-apply=E2=80=99.) That would only apply until a function was subsequently called from C. Andy --=20 http://wingolog.org/