From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Updated Guile Tutorial Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 22:41:37 -0700 Message-ID: References: <4A7B223E.6050501@domob.eu> <4A92B446.2090902@domob.eu> <87tyyxsheh.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1282196322 29694 80.91.229.12 (19 Aug 2010 05:38:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 05:38:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Daniel Kraft , guile-devel To: Neil Jerram Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 19 07:38:41 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Olxpp-0006jp-2Q for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 07:38:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60741 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Olxpo-00072c-E0 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 01:38:40 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42250 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Olxpj-00071Z-6i for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 01:38:36 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Olxph-0007Pu-OA for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 01:38:35 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:42245 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Olxph-0007Pn-MM for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 01:38:33 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF87BCEBC3; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 01:38:32 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=3gTumWzcMTC/hRQgI73jite+BvA=; b=s6g1cQ 1xIuY6+Oc+N3POLZlwiCjAMtUgeRoP24ivGeD/q1VnJL2ywpgH/xgKci/YJiftoz Gtv4BPd2/rX3gsGMdwGJrauJ5RH2f+vIIwexnA2drvqkFleZy2ZLGuhCXn7Ipso/ FksX++VIi1C0Ndi+h5gYsojsrZiKKqUVHPXSY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=ezf1SfmPzVXIutG+EZc2EECU+y4GfhQl DHon5O6lIxB8rzbLudv+pwwreG7xxjN9sv9ArVYXgk1sqLgF2Pz8fr/gAFXMzG9v MAnldbV1+korxUg3EK3U1ZWWmPK5FttL75rYeVoXQSWAS9NqJAOK6mxNFcTd4AbB dOB5+pCVzKg= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC9AECEBC2; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 01:38:30 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [76.166.198.241]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3B6A5CEBC1; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 01:38:28 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87tyyxsheh.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> (Neil Jerram's message of "Sun, 20 Sep 2009 17:35:50 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: FFD8AF38-AB53-11DF-86F1-9056EE7EF46B-02397024!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:10772 Archived-At: Hi, Looking over some old mails... On Sun 20 Sep 2009 09:35, Neil Jerram writes: > Daniel Kraft writes: > >> here's the promised revised version of my Guile tutorial; > > I've now added this to the Guile web pages, and linked to it from > http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/docs/docs.html. Sorry for taking so > long about it. Please let me know if you have any feedback on how I've > done this. This is a good step, but we should have some more finality here. They are of similar length; we should replace the old tutorial with the new. And should the tutorial go in Guile's source distro? What about integrated with the manual? Also at this point, it should mention the dynamic FFI. Thoughts appreciated, otherwise I'll make random decisions sometime soon. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/