From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: compiler dep on r6rs Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 15:07:32 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87pqricw7u.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1296137171 4028 80.91.229.12 (27 Jan 2011 14:06:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 14:06:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 27 15:06:06 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PiSU0-00052k-Qq for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 15:05:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58289 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PiSTz-0006QA-2D for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 09:05:55 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=57132 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PiSTn-0005dM-S9 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 09:05:49 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PiSQp-0007ls-DN for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 09:02:40 -0500 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:51554 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PiSQp-0007lm-At; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 09:02:39 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E5622ADA; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 09:03:27 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=ao5pIfwv03HZ g8PxTRHIWR9nvq0=; b=IZdEz6F7OaJkNonrZeAxKqpR6HZDsDHvAr++kQebV9md 1QQSJ4ideRmRNYpHMGb2B7dxouSt8Vrr2gujkF7iFruyYOF7po6WheSGo5MbgPvq iE3ZsosvSK+4UxPFgpJro0+/tTTKk9SIDdi8UcX9Jl+InAt9iqH4SMKmiIPYHHo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=lXctZP pQTuH8H7CD4VOCYpy6AAq3PLsM8gmtycitciDsMeU5MtKiB6/qNTlVp7RD2aKjHj HSOVD3+ilV3l0DBS4PlyRV/bKbetaCwHSqUNPER8JpM1sOu2GYLLnsPIlr/YtcHD Kzl0YdLTdNqBVCr7cuuCsuMlQTciKgCLX8QXE= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 598D12AD9; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 09:03:26 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B91422AD8; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 09:03:24 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87pqricw7u.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Thu, 27 Jan 2011 14:28:05 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 35EDF54E-2A1E-11E0-A2CE-BC4EF3E828EC-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:11360 Archived-At: Hi, On Thu 27 Jan 2011 14:28, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > A potential problem is that (rnrs io ports) uses bytevectors, defined in > (rnrs bytevectors), so we would perhaps need an (ice-9 bytevectors) as > well[*], and a new node in the manual for each, etc. Currently (rnrs bytevectors) doesn't import (rnrs base), and I can't see that changing any time soon, so perhaps we can leave (rnrs bytevectors) where it is. > Is the only problem of the current solution that compilation of Guile > itself is slower? (Which is a real problem, but I=E2=80=99m trying to ge= t the > big picture.) Yes, and opens more files, and takes more memory. Regards, Andy --=20 http://wingolog.org/