From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: problem with trailing comment in repl Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2011 23:56:16 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87r5beb7dg.fsf@gnu.org> <8739ntbd8a.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1299192999 17557 80.91.229.12 (3 Mar 2011 22:56:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 22:56:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Jose A. Ortega Ruiz" , guile-devel@gnu.org To: Noah Lavine Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 03 23:56:34 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PvHRg-0006An-ML for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 23:56:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52090 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PvHRg-0005qg-4H for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 17:56:32 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=33050 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PvHRZ-0005md-Ta for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 17:56:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PvHRW-0001dE-Au for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 17:56:25 -0500 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:64310 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PvHRW-0001d7-7H; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 17:56:22 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDA0D466B; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 17:57:41 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=R4Ati8MusbOp+uaIYFHp4/9l3/E=; b=D62ALq 9dKi+ejWTU+xBEV+2UvkPZ95a8WKetuj86UzA87rA8YtLRGT7cJ51znmtH4bSiYW VoBKa/L/da6QHq8Lhb8IC94GOrelm+JNe2/a+7NI2wD83+BInEbtn/mde+WnsnDl SIxN0ZwAAmYVPfYhaK13wIhMbQTR0/UDP9Ydk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=M9/WwIrGdFvxrrJnlSBsNebQG9SdyZam Q6RLBX3Eok+5CwSBnUC2QC9FI91/xs5XeiU+Q81cOal97QmRWCYuGNwZWBeyP8Rw LmwdCxbtkeYXvF9907cO+Krzt3+PsnbjSyLmPwhcmdg9q+YV8TIjt6MwRSd8UuZE 3mYoD3gNLlU= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA2F94668; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 17:57:39 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DE4804666; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 17:57:36 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Noah Lavine's message of "Sun, 13 Feb 2011 16:27:16 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: A3B2C834-45E9-11E0-91F1-AF401E47CF6F-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 64.74.157.62 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:11762 Archived-At: On Sun 13 Feb 2011 22:27, Noah Lavine writes: > The attached patch does it. I almost hate to commit it because it's > such a hack, but this is from my last Guile session: > > scheme@(guile-user)> 'foo > $2 = foo > scheme@(guile-user)> 'foo ; hi there! > $3 = foo > scheme@(guile-user)> ; why, hello! > scheme@(guile-user)> ,q It was a hack, in both the good and bad senses of the word ;-) I ended up pushing something similar. Let me know how it goes. Regards, Andy -- http://wingolog.org/