From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Hang in threads.test Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 21:17:09 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87tylmrch6.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87zkv94jf9.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87y6asqe2i.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87zkq0i7c1.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1297627934 5216 80.91.229.12 (13 Feb 2011 20:12:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 20:12:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: Neil Jerram Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 13 21:12:10 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PoiIj-0007Yr-Pt for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2011 21:12:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40753 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PoiIh-0004oI-OJ for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2011 15:12:07 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=54009 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PoiIe-0004ny-IK for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2011 15:12:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PoiId-0007zD-6R for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2011 15:12:04 -0500 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:51873 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PoiId-0007z7-0P for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2011 15:12:03 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B26AA4CB8; Sun, 13 Feb 2011 15:13:05 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=WhAy6TJ2ZLLQ2SqnMuNGTkH+9yc=; b=cwEqZE o/ZdCDimjh1tI4LiTPAQZc0xO8UjeHGa9LvMoEbkgwYUYw2px5e1w/BcUbVmnIH7 nt+ceHhon4Fg3YmN7AA/Ii8lemDOH8dh3MihwFs5WzRyrpF7lUjjHy4yJ4aLfMh7 ZQ7V+aMm9qODIdfu/BmlnQzN9ZvToDXOOK7xc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=ghRFUPXxKOtZ0Ap3c7wBpJdZXVdOGoCI 4mvYYfOXPALPnJm8TnV3RKqSrX2UGssuJ7mqwmoGMDEJbQJP7eD/IAXMDx0cVpAJ qMdxTp+QXsPhcQJw7B9S+APNAZL9zSEaMMS/4K0MXsfb97wDITqhn1EDCEfVjsSE SGKy6U/Wbdk= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A9D24CB7; Sun, 13 Feb 2011 15:13:04 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DBBC84CB6; Sun, 13 Feb 2011 15:13:02 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87zkq0i7c1.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> (Neil Jerram's message of "Sun, 13 Feb 2011 09:58:54 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: AA3A2BF6-37AD-11E0-87F2-AF401E47CF6F-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 64.74.157.62 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:11606 Archived-At: On Sun 13 Feb 2011 10:58, Neil Jerram writes: > No. But that might be because the libgc on that machine - Debian > 1:7.1-3 - is too old. What is the latest recommendation for libgc > version? README says "at least version 7.0", but I suspect that's out > of date. I think we are a little incoherent on that point, given that 6.8 works, and there is no 7.2 release. Also, while there are bugs like https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?32436 that persist with CVS libgc, it's tough to say. I wonder actually if this bug is related to that one. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/