From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Several tweaks for R6RS ports Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 11:37:50 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87aah8qk5a.fsf@gmx.at> <87tyfe2ztd.fsf@gmx.at> <877hc2mzk0.fsf@gnu.org> <87aagljqe4.fsf@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1302863908 30321 80.91.229.12 (15 Apr 2011 10:38:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 10:38:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , guile-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas Rottmann Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 15 12:38:24 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QAgPs-00026Q-JD for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 12:38:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43797 helo=lists2.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QAgPs-0001jC-5V for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 06:38:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:34520) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QAgPm-0001eU-D3 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 06:38:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QAgPl-0008Jw-CA for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 06:38:14 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:62734 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QAgPl-0008Jp-AK; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 06:38:13 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 948623DD6; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 06:40:12 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=5E3SckokLcMr i33jOkm1Ntsx07g=; b=WD0Q2twU4p6bTtyb0FQk9NH8OmU7zZCZo3s9anVWlVIf hb/3kSXsHfOzIWsmlVDeitgaHXAgu9GB+qfOXLLP2Bjlvx1a+DxdKnKtalhbh854 VXeotSXeyVPsNdHMqzFbedAAFv6SxJYC5nFhGUa8CA8U4xm4T5m0deOJS6GU3PE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=HSfmKN CEqUIQzP6i7z3PeIgMQgCymrZX2IRaZ7/0rhScg2GmImbtDAxilB/QaD6w40le+f twFIK/n3mzdZ50J2vHAm0OhK9KNdH36MVu6mPjqgeuolUruUGd4AV8qeWJeQMKN4 rFikAp0djGwcCuXPWEpu9isOwarTypLOMBuE4= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 729613DD4; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 06:40:09 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9E1D03DD3; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 06:40:06 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87aagljqe4.fsf@gmx.at> (Andreas Rottmann's message of "Thu, 24 Mar 2011 01:47:31 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: BC34B262-674C-11E0-86CE-E8AB60295C12-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 64.74.157.62 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:12266 Archived-At: Hi Andreas, On Thu 24 Mar 2011 01:47, Andreas Rottmann writes: > ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > >> Could you send a patch to update the manual? >> > I have started working on this, but I'm notorious (at least to myself) > for starving documentation-related work with interesting coding stuff > that comes along, so don't hold your breath ;-). Believe me, I understand. However if you don't do it, it means someone else has to, or otherwise we go without docs. I can think of various kinds of patch economies out there. If there existed people that just like to document other people's work, then we could indeed think of this arrangement as the most efficient. However until such a person comes along, the most fair thing seems to be for those that have the pleasure of interesting coding also handle their share of documentation. So, if you have time, we would appreciate docs on these pieces of Guile :) Regards, Andy --=20 http://wingolog.org/