From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Changing the signature of =?utf-8?b?4oCYdmhhc2gtYXNzb2PigJk=?= Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 09:38:52 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87wrszxpx9.fsf@gnu.org> <87oce8e7wa.fsf@gnu.org> <87iq49n3oj.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1279697790 22959 80.91.229.12 (21 Jul 2010 07:36:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 07:36:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 21 09:36:28 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ObTqu-0006AL-8x for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 09:36:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33185 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ObTqt-0000Lg-Ea for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 03:36:27 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=33637 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ObTqe-0000Kr-0U for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 03:36:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ObTqc-00053l-TJ for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 03:36:11 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:34203 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ObTqc-00053c-R2; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 03:36:10 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1121BC4F80; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 03:36:10 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=SnBEPD2I3hrT SdHz3y1IF9X8+uQ=; b=hOV3RxazT9IgF0bm7j00bEM1yPJPj8M9L7kImnO7LbzA bDLgRI598cAL9KUVArsC4oNWSH2qaPNe4OeQzGo8dA7bqalStuYfdunGQha7BA2Q WSSWUyS8yCX5lZYnDTRVRU4ddikUJUJA+m8CF638EWeSuI2b8rqbR56YjO9BDIU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=HCQ8qi YHEhyiUfL0DiLLXlioeDSk/BooS/t8kksMJNd9PunHpezu9vpfg18iP57RbvUYfA 3sgz/UdVWgYy+FUAvwqCLwFzVWqIKeMXOto17hiek5ydighatMMfxhtMGjqGBczS K5Lv9a26lumZmlHdg7vRv39yJ9K8QIaQtI/x4= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1545C4F7F; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 03:36:08 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [81.39.161.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DF70CC4F7E; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 03:36:06 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87iq49n3oj.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Wed, 21 Jul 2010 01:17:48 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: A0E46FE6-949A-11DF-B63B-9056EE7EF46B-02397024!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:10712 Archived-At: Hi, On Wed 21 Jul 2010 01:17, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: >>> Indeed, if =E2=80=98vhash-assoc=E2=80=99 et al. are changed to return a= vhash instead of >>> a pair >> >> Thinking more about it, I think I=E2=80=99d rather keep =E2=80=98vhash-a= ssoc=E2=80=99 & co. as >> they are, and add =E2=80=98vhash-assoc*=E2=80=99 & co., which would retu= rn a vhash. > > Commit 927bf5e8cc0af9515797ebab6d9ba162bef23c2a is roughly the original > patch. Doesn't that impose an allocation penalty on vhash-assoc? A --=20 http://wingolog.org/