From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add new debug meta-command ,error Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 18:54:35 -0700 Message-ID: References: <1283143931-6220-1-git-send-email-jao@gnu.org> <87aao36gag.fsf@newton.homeunix.net> <8762yr6d9v.fsf@newton.homeunix.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1283219493 20959 80.91.229.12 (31 Aug 2010 01:51:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 01:51:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: "Jose A. Ortega Ruiz" Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 31 03:51:32 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OqG0a-0000fl-9r for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 03:51:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35025 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OqG0Z-00022S-Nq for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 21:51:31 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=52919 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OqG0S-000213-7j for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 21:51:25 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OqG0R-0005p7-1S for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 21:51:24 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:49875 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OqG0Q-0005p1-Vb; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 21:51:23 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59FAED1032; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 21:51:22 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=A2tf3RMp8oVavmiDkl8JZhY0p2E=; b=Gjz4jv qh5jj1noFziwxzhV1ocAbNc6zPRAbBJciZdm0ZzSBPm3w3iZnaYKPB43rzr0oWKS UYkUmAJqjVkVgydmauNJTVu3dRX0XzCqPQgU/XS/MTq3UkscTh4+ywQiqh+H6dJI PYGHRYZjWn99N1LLIrTmoWKE1ybe1DSbAiPBs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=qRvB2D5MNUlVwgx2pOlh1ggd2mrHMK0H rd+s+AwuZNbBOLCMuDqS1CEWTuOPZuhFWuMkTu7g2Zk6/w5kOADbiEYoZouPplcY 4g48/Lg3G3QAHYDGLLPPV34F4Yk3pDmbcE4OQZVEA6wIieE5SlAJPC7UZhRgC/PR sX//cSXNepY= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 466FCD1031; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 21:51:21 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [66.92.56.34]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DB411D1030; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 21:51:19 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <8762yr6d9v.fsf@newton.homeunix.net> (Jose A. Ortega Ruiz's message of "Mon, 30 Aug 2010 22:45:00 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 40FFC8FA-B4A2-11DF-A2F6-030CEE7EF46B-02397024!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:10816 Archived-At: On Mon 30 Aug 2010 13:45, "Jose A. Ortega Ruiz" writes: > On Mon, Aug 30 2010, Andy Wingo wrote: > >> On Mon 30 Aug 2010 12:39, "Jose A. Ortega Ruiz" writes: >> >>> changed the name of the command from `error' to `message' >> >>> I'm not specially happy with the new name, but couldn't think of >>> anything better. Suggestions welcome. >> >> How about "error-message" ? Perhaps abbreviated as ,error ? > > yeah, that was my first idea, but i thought you'd find it too long :) > i'm for it if you like it, though -- perhaps we could abbreviate it as > ,e to compensate? I would prefer ,error-message and ,error, I think; I feel like we could use ,e for other things (eval, expand, ...). Andy -- http://wingolog.org/