From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Cross-compiling Guile 2.0 Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 22:53:40 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87hbbhbb99.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87k4gb99uv.fsf@gnu.org> <87bp18pwbi.fsf@gnu.org> <87mxkp2958.fsf@gnu.org> <87ipvdzdg7.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1300658582 26418 80.91.229.12 (20 Mar 2011 22:03:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 22:03:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 20 23:02:55 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q1Qi2-0006sj-Is for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 23:02:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43471 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q1QZD-0002IP-Lm for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 17:53:43 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=51496 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q1QZ4-0002DV-Mq for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 17:53:35 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q1QZ3-00081B-A4 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 17:53:34 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:48120 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q1QZ3-000816-6T; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 17:53:33 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F043A4D84; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 17:55:09 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=yvaK+/SonkRQ XSERfZqcjs32wDM=; b=LLkUopa9EU7rtrZ2wQ8o3+Gzr7UvBM7CqwjWYwPEs3gw JJMlWLx79mgnkybKa2vCGUwFB7VurXF8+4NDNz4kF0ENaSVDpGKg1R4ymTnwKG3J BBdqvLtO1ddWgSzyqzZpNYNwVAFDDJJ/5e3NyhntiUthLx9tL+S3QwydJYQi7bM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=RRyhuX IX1JXnuk1QRxiZIDUukDkrkl0Eh/0O8rbvp2c6jeuglyy8/PpnLZiD6afVONpEpA W2lUSreMcAfkuBe66j5lKL2vTATeoPuo2oIdMSqGz5CwL6K19Rrxu6hblG5876+Z LcrHb7oi9Wbw64aiUuQIyXAcizFSRBj3l/ccQ= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C971E4D83; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 17:55:07 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 087CE4D82; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 17:55:05 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87ipvdzdg7.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Sun, 20 Mar 2011 22:31:20 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: B856A76E-533C-11E0-9779-E8AB60295C12-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 64.74.157.62 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:11931 Archived-At: On Sun 20 Mar 2011 22:31, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > What I meant to say here, is that via a couple of knobs akin to > =E2=80=98current-target-endianness=E2=80=99, you could actually cross-bui= ld for any > target. Yes, provided you have the compiler of course. > Thus =E2=80=98%target-type=E2=80=99 would be inappropriate IMO because th= e target could > be chosen at run-time and it could be anything. > > =E2=80=98guile-tools compile --target=3DTRIPLET=E2=80=99 would be fine wi= th me. I see. Yes that sounds fine; perhaps we could have %target-type, but have it be a fluid. Does that make sense? Cheers, Andy --=20 http://wingolog.org/