From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: bdw-gc includes in libguile.h Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 09:35:02 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87hbardqgw.fsf@gnu.org> <874o6ovbsa.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1301297704 1900 80.91.229.12 (28 Mar 2011 07:35:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 07:35:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 28 09:35:00 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q46yU-0003hE-9A for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 09:34:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40211 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q46yT-0006uf-QC for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 03:34:53 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=40317 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q46yP-0006uW-UM for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 03:34:50 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q46yO-0001Iv-LJ for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 03:34:49 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:52359 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q46yO-0001Ij-Gi; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 03:34:48 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AA9E2325; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 03:36:33 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=S+fhyqQmVQnv hrvxrL3xsPGpUzg=; b=IDTXYFfV8OGCXA41bQq7mjBjm03LTvpTYuh85QjYf0/K FCdV9Kn4JvCaHjuz6cbjvsvQE5UXtYGRd67Vb6g/SmhvepU2PExw+iW1ceTUOslt M0NGZFX5oNHtab3pRQm2a7jCGPa+BhvNlmx/7c4+FOUXFWdM8REAYSSO1RNxXLQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=r08gel GHKeRyQQzNEPlubYkbc+AmshSCXNiYGjGswgUlmDE17ZGF9dyp9YP1zed+fTGM89 4IYpCUhcB06SoQKeoI/oXUmD275GomsOl0goihxR0B2bgcpOuEjI7Ux8u55RNNVg gSJunkqLnDgG1zAd5FVUMaPZAK9TS2Qut7Jro= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 177272324; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 03:36:31 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 79A852320; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 03:36:29 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <874o6ovbsa.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Sun, 27 Mar 2011 17:11:17 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 194F4B08-590E-11E0-AC3A-E8AB60295C12-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 64.74.157.62 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:12021 Archived-At: Greets :) On Sun 27 Mar 2011 17:11, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > Internally we should still inline scm_cell & co., though; that can be > done without exposing in public headers I guess. (Actually, > we should inline scm_cons, too, internally.) Agreed. >>> A meta-comment: can we agree to take more time to discuss this sort of >>> things? I=E2=80=99ll try to be responsive, and the earth won=E2=80=99t= stop spinning if >>> the fix waits a couple of days. ;-) >> >> Sure. Sorry for the precipitous action. That said, this bug has been >> open since September: https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?32436 > > Oh indeed, I hadn=E2=80=99t realized there=E2=80=99s a connection; still.= .. Do you have any thoughts on that bug, or the recent threads.c patches? Andy --=20 http://wingolog.org/