From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: (set! (@@ MOD NAME) EXP) considered harmful Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:29:59 +0200 Message-ID: References: <877hwhqq2g.fsf@netris.org> <873a6nykap.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <871vm52p4o.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1253284317 9809 80.91.229.12 (18 Sep 2009 14:31:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:31:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 18 16:31:50 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MoeV3-000612-HR for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:31:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36974 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MoeV2-0006zW-KT for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:31:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MoeU9-0006XD-BK for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:30:53 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MoeU4-0006Uc-GT for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:30:52 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38746 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MoeU4-0006UR-9E for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:30:48 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:37604 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MoeTz-0003ui-8w; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:30:43 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6806437E94; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:30:42 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=0aTRQE6sokXX 1dbrveiDplO91YI=; b=GaTlpXvBTdR2nW9snekf7idOdiLKJNNzf2DOAGMOjVXv eN8X0++G+3CskT1qwFtuomxk7sZR2DGYx4pYmXujkW/Isuflvh3HDlgnXsR85Hgx dKRdK8dMiJvo7tk0efOtswFYNHpmyDPZcpzY8vgtB0Uqxnesfix2dIBr2NiCow0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=YP0yyj UimzpYW9/+vBiPXKwgGllxxkO1s7gUM9hNxj4lkBgRppELrvXAOTbqTujVIZhRKu C0PnGBnamTkaviTRQEZt8Ke/SuVI+a9FYmdFDVi6bB+gBX81jvW9QBT113RLtSKf NjLacUtPgtf+EcGlrNTdSkA0y6/XJVPcxjlvs= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56B7637E93; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:30:41 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote (unknown [67.244.74.121]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 167C237E92; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:30:39 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <871vm52p4o.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Fri, 18 Sep 2009 00:16:39 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: D792AA0C-A45F-11DE-AE57-A13518FFA523-02397024!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:9348 Archived-At: On Fri 18 Sep 2009 00:16, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > Perhaps the compiler should make it possible to choose a tradeoff > between dynamicity and performance, e.g., by actually honoring the =E2=80= =98:O=E2=80=99 > compile option? Sure, sounds good to me. We should also have in-source directives, like (declare (speed 3)) or such. Andy --=20 http://wingolog.org/