From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: upcoming patches Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 20:24:31 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87aazo74zd.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1255977137 22713 80.91.229.12 (19 Oct 2009 18:32:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:32:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Mark H. Weaver" , guile-devel To: Neil Jerram Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 19 20:32:07 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Mzx1X-0004bW-2E for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 20:32:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55134 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mzx1W-0000pq-H7 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:32:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mzx0y-0000b2-R0 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:31:28 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mzx0s-0000XY-SN for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:31:27 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42501 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mzx0s-0000XR-FN for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:31:22 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:61571 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mzx0s-0003tm-2J for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:31:22 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4DEB7DD9B; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:31:21 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=fHB8b5nRZ/JQ2/FzzLAposYhV1U=; b=rWEWCf 14YklRTy2hlvs8tehdYPBl2wsX+YRFI4vM7FzcBfI5FUr0WzYXPVI5hJ7AYdEdu/ HTATScUAk8ShFVP2KYhsgStten6RJX21JN4RevTR4pDikbj5rzwbkvjs2nJ2OIg1 7uy0mBeqq71rA+38c7GOUfq2FuIcRstBlH3o8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=xSMOqrmiCA/rrsMGs1BHhToGLl83wRx8 7u/KFkovSNuuDbRZtTDci/baBdhij5hbmWtJGpIJY+Qbiefb+07cWikaV8KY+jUx YJ9XUCC7ij2wK5/GwUwDuLfLnpOIWhaXL/i/DmFMoBaGAH05O9Mbag3pT8cIHERU jtEyfG3Nr0A= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8969C7DD99; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:31:19 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote (unknown [83.34.240.150]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2BD907DD98; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:31:08 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87aazo74zd.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> (Neil Jerram's message of "Sun, 18 Oct 2009 22:43:34 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 9836CB36-BCDD-11DE-9CF2-A67CBBB5EC2E-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:9514 Archived-At: On Sun 18 Oct 2009 23:43, Neil Jerram writes: > Andy Wingo writes: > >> 2) Make sure Mark's patch is in >> >> If Neil gets to this one first, that's fine :) But it needs to go >> in, so that > > Have I missed this? I _think_ I'm still waiting for Mark's updated > patch... > > Many apologies in advance if I have missed it! Oh no, I haven't seen a new one either. I was just going to take a look at the old one again and see how much work it needed -- because it's not fair to Daniel to keep his work in limbo, IMO. Cheers, Andy -- http://wingolog.org/