From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: more compilation failures: -DSCM_DEBUG_TYPING_STRICTNESS=2 Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:18:21 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87aayk2my2.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1258580130 3263 80.91.229.12 (18 Nov 2009 21:35:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:35:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , guile-devel@gnu.org To: Ken Raeburn Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 18 22:35:22 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NAsBO-0002en-4H for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:35:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59440 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NAsBN-0006xc-4G for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:35:21 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NAsBG-0006xG-MP for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:35:14 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NAsBC-0006wR-6p for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:35:14 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60159 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NAsBC-0006wI-4L for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:35:10 -0500 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:62690 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NAsB6-0007jn-Ps; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:35:04 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F09FA81508; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:35:03 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=Bmyi8pjFyDSI hcLo6j1AUjJZjpc=; b=VE1OrbNFIAWVjzcuF3V829+qXqvvk0qQRxoJL+Qon9KP Ntb9fcjTIUGGz66rGl42Y02w+KDSM2FynIMv0P9dzrvkPbBssUENX2C1YJur+V/b MyJEwzXtXstmzoVop+X2DMsrMHeZL6zjbVyd3miK4kgvg9xEot1Z5NpUPtVRP8M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=swzUEh EyhSTw1B/27/9oTSBSYRl1XFeMTms5RHUERdjtJWvE9AHajgh70OaQxHeOm4gL5L APcoAYhb1BTkmzkEPPSKGuU0kSZrbTkudhDw+0JqY3berb6Da0Y0R0jIMQdGSnBc 6jUoGgJr9wBuqFXUIkFTRbuIYuaulnLPRm7/I= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D109A81507; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:35:01 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from unquote (unknown [79.156.144.199]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EF5D981503; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:34:58 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Ken Raeburn's message of "Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:40:21 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 3A69AA72-D48A-11DE-8820-9F3FEE7EF46B-02397024!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:9700 Archived-At: Hi :) On Wed 18 Nov 2009 21:40, Ken Raeburn writes: > On Nov 18, 2009, at 04:37, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> Now, if =E2=80=98SCM_DEBUG_TYPING_STRICTNESS=E2=80=99 can help us preven= t breakage, >> that=E2=80=99s nice. I=E2=80=99ve never used it so far, and never felt = the need to >> use >> it, but I=E2=80=99d be glad to follow your lead on this matter. :-) > > That's one... ;-) I'm happy to have it help out, but "with other people" ;) Perhaps I can be the one ensuring that it works as it currently does? ;) Andy --=20 http://wingolog.org/