From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Where the next effort in prolog will be and a cool match hack!! Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 10:50:49 +0200 Message-ID: References: <201009092315.02287.stefan.tampe@spray.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1284126052 11383 80.91.229.12 (10 Sep 2010 13:40:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 13:40:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Israelsson Tampe Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 10 15:40:50 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ou3qT-0002aR-VI for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 15:40:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37828 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ou3qT-0003kY-Bg for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:40:49 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44966 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ou3qF-0003fc-Bb for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:40:39 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ou3q8-0005gC-Uo for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:40:35 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:47048 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ou3q8-0005g4-T6 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:40:28 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B22BED46CC; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:40:28 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=VYDg1t1zR7cMM4IOMFraILV/Tjg=; b=R9Gjlv UoHDKTgafL6+zkMPFWsM3qcFi/ET1Kbt27ava7njIGGulqH1uWHaINKwI+9UZVom caWx1PTaOz/qUlpFae7x6EPOeE9F/qtqqHhTPN/FgHppLUkq3joFs40fExBG2od0 m/mEKVQkHlDME8aVIwnM4OieMbscr/L19r7So= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=LrQV0Rx3UPWMqeYVnHZ1YbXJQ7O7eb6a X4lujIkU8dmIPjbzK9CykJjSfJrbyiqSzB5s6ilAPJJb0a5gM8kOFj0l2dSl+uui DikcjEc/g6pE76LS4dWtTBwZjfbxh6Ql4zT5HJncsjWf5nst7QuND/DZ+bpmyc+N gvMKl+uBo/4= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87FA7D46CB; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:40:26 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [79.156.144.156]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BE21AD46C8; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:40:23 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <201009092315.02287.stefan.tampe@spray.se> (Stefan Israelsson Tampe's message of "Thu, 9 Sep 2010 23:15:02 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: F811EB9A-BCE0-11DF-839F-030CEE7EF46B-02397024!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:10901 Archived-At: Hi Stefan, No comments on the actual code, but: On Thu 09 Sep 2010 23:15, Stefan Israelsson Tampe writes: > (use-modules (ice-9 match-phd)) I think this is the right approach (making a separate) :) Alex's code is clean, understandable, and has a historical interface to respect. Your has lots of interesting ideas but it is still in flux, and I don't understand it all. So a stis-match module does sound like the right thing here :) Andy -- http://wingolog.org/