From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: git push weird? Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 23:07:47 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87fx0ozfx1.fsf@ambire.localdomain> <87sk4onmzw.fsf@gnu.org> <871vc8nl0g.fsf@ambire.localdomain> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1276636639 31008 80.91.229.12 (15 Jun 2010 21:17:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 21:17:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , guile-devel@gnu.org To: Thien-Thi Nguyen Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 15 23:17:17 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OOdVE-00083J-0G for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 23:17:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34829 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OOdV4-00023i-RE for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 17:16:50 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44775 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OOdUv-00022Z-4y for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 17:16:42 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OOdUs-0008IS-UQ for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 17:16:40 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:60658 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OOdUs-0008IL-Se; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 17:16:38 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B242BC385; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 17:05:42 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=MXwgIn7JHML1 yjUQO/wEUEnGfOc=; b=VdKj8yQY/g3jsmUZWTVVbVRKy8Uw0j7f+iuPwMgn+qsU GGs+Not2/DwXP+dn0xm2wnje58QdadMxiiVAnyAzB14W1V4GGK/Ca0rHukGlcYFi rexyhdZZKgrMshNhz80Sna3bGW6mVbPJl7/3+cy0UP0Gj9ul/ScKKWW5lzZt8b4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=mnSa0b xvZ4gB8eqjr6v3MUir2iTV6m5r/enQGH2Wl73YXCh5dzNeRPsEw9r0xjoSFDdKpy TmXA7PF/8sYgcRfOksKwDMTZ+vlbXtuwaddGeERInLR0qcED1gDYItiqfuvIZece ODdGTvJZaR3auFJo/WSqB3oKnBfbIKpsxpd1s= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16812BC383; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 17:05:40 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote (unknown [81.39.158.44]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5D2AABC382; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 17:05:37 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <871vc8nl0g.fsf@ambire.localdomain> (Thien-Thi Nguyen's message of "Tue, 15 Jun 2010 21:39:11 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: C0A7406E-78C1-11DF-8A17-9056EE7EF46B-02397024!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:10491 Archived-At: Greets, On Tue 15 Jun 2010 21:39, Thien-Thi Nguyen writes: > () ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) > () Tue, 15 Jun 2010 20:56:19 +0200 > > Besides, did you mean to push to =E2=80=98master=E2=80=99? > > Yes, but now i believe that that was fuzzy thinking, not to mention > in disregard of my agreement to not do so made several months ago > (which i didn't remember until just after pressing RET -- sigh). :-( > I will push only to ttn/* henceforth. Cool, that would be great. > Could you please undo the damage on =E2=80=98master=E2=80=99? Just for readability I have rebased the commits. The gnulib commit will get overwritten at the next gnulib import. GUILE_CONFIG_SCRIPT is fine. It's good to have tmpfile, but I wonder about making the port-filename not a string or #f. 'tmpfile seems too magical to me; if you're working from scheme you can always associate a tmpfile object property on the port, and I wouldn't want people to start asking if it's a tmpfile. So I have changed it to return #f. If you really think that 'tmpfile is the right thing, let's talk about it :) Cheers, Andy --=20 http://wingolog.org/