From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: GSOC PEG project Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2010 17:23:40 +0100 Message-ID: References: <874ogdmu2m.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1278682570 11267 80.91.229.12 (9 Jul 2010 13:36:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 13:36:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Michael Lucy , Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , guile-devel@gnu.org To: No Itisnt Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 09 15:36:07 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OXDkK-0007p0-Mc for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 15:36:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48266 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OXDkJ-0000od-Qi for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 09:36:04 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36366 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OXDjw-0000lD-WE for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 09:35:42 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OXDjv-0007uZ-Rd for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 09:35:40 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:43135 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OXDjv-0007rA-Od; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 09:35:39 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF645C250A; Fri, 9 Jul 2010 09:35:22 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=HHYkYMZJM9IlEJuKARZ5YWBbufo=; b=VG1+iG kU0LODA7He2mMF3nDjoZCy6WMzCCAQrJDFCK6mtc37L2fkSRZvofSs5TYsznbWR0 WNc6ZNpZZLGTRM7P80Y17JSyA37Z8KrkTuU2CGhgEGeEEt0RLrS39qUgSVIB+aUF ylYIvbmFtX/G9qJRboF1syyR6w4Zjbtuis1hI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=Px71IRq6Nf2RBRL65PwdBwxQ/PfsrW/I MQ1q3LCaGiDTmLbqps+hxDoazTUwKUptQrCTp3mdZZbie2oC072G8iobU1k+lEx+ NXxcYFgZgxQHHP+QGw4a+di49xQavqu62OBfG54DljJS2UJSNqsn3794s7TsIdJj DQY/j/gAQgs= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EC7EC2501; Fri, 9 Jul 2010 09:35:19 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [81.39.161.70]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9A976C24F5; Fri, 9 Jul 2010 09:35:15 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (No Itisnt's message of "Mon, 5 Jul 2010 20:41:23 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: D10DB62C-8B5E-11DF-A997-9056EE7EF46B-02397024!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:10635 Archived-At: Good day sir or lady, Agreed regarding all of your points, and particularly: On Tue 06 Jul 2010 02:41, No Itisnt writes: > A personal whinge: I would like to be able to specify grammars in > Scheme, using macros as the sugar instead of a different syntax. Yes! > Exciting stuff :) I can't wait to use this, maintaining my own > hand-written recursive descent parser is like watching a trainwreck in > slow motion. Also yes! Happy hacking, Andy -- http://wingolog.org/