From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Complex numbers with inexact zero imaginary part, etc Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 21:29:02 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87zkqeu19q.fsf@yeeloong.netris.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1296678266 27346 80.91.229.12 (2 Feb 2011 20:24:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 20:24:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: Mark H Weaver Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 02 21:24:22 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PkjFT-0005eA-Sf for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 21:24:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46807 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PkjFS-0005ZG-ST for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 15:24:18 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36543 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PkjFI-0005Yr-6h for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 15:24:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PkjFC-0007sZ-R1 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 15:24:08 -0500 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:61862 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PkjFC-0007sT-Oe for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 15:24:02 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE04B35CE; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 15:24:55 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=1tLYI1m1qukNJ/1iRI7syS0Y6LM=; b=emMQ/E HL8G48A5ob5O4QOSI6NSybREAcZ8dakx3n0I+lXT6V+OML1Qln+stuV3i9FHzgJW Vab16wGbgWG3+PxUe/FcUOI6Vil9lNrachYqS+2x0eKsyeBMGsLRlu+5/uTe7wRl dbl4g5A4m3OTwQAnHOs3IRmHBnM5FwR6X9FTc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=WZZleDOpxJe/1kt9RgPaaxy0YjtO+vPF H4/hs+sQj6EhngOpQRTg5cxiV2fxhdt6syUG2kWUV402yt5qzGAD70svdKYE5M5T U6NVeYJDByQQzIwzAgCefmnXvuseuu3R9bFGv40TTiB80cnfEeP7V7vT6Uw+mnhx nXCtFEQSr8U= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C6FC35CD; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 15:24:54 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DD6E235CC; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 15:24:52 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87zkqeu19q.fsf@yeeloong.netris.org> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Wed, 02 Feb 2011 06:25:05 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 7EDE7FF8-2F0A-11E0-AA34-F13235C70CBC-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 64.74.157.62 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:11518 Archived-At: On Wed 02 Feb 2011 12:25, Mark H Weaver writes: > * libguile/numbers.c (scm_abs): (abs -0.0) now returns 0.0. Previously > it returned -0.0. I applied this, but is it right? I can convince myself both ways. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/