From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Trouble joining with threads from C Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 16:19:40 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87y64rzd5p.fsf@netris.org> <8762rswzzf.fsf@netris.org> <87vczdqtdx.fsf@gnu.org> <87ipuhzvvk.fsf@gnu.org> <877haxzvh6.fsf@gnu.org> <87vcy2mo8j.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1303741227 565 80.91.229.12 (25 Apr 2011 14:20:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 14:20:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 25 16:20:23 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QEMeD-0008Dd-Hj for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 16:20:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35293 helo=lists2.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QEMeD-0000AH-2u for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 10:20:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:45697) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QEMeA-0000A1-8b for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 10:20:19 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QEMe9-0003vz-3g for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 10:20:18 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:57404 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QEMe9-0003oY-0I; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 10:20:17 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38F93515B; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 10:21:50 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=oQOruiA+JEB/ ohVt3bnH7kDXy68=; b=VUH4P1gkjvpLfk5hJVRuuFKp1f5stAShK5mTrHbPGf5T sUEeC9KnBI0UJy7Y0xj4NXue2Kh+gEo/TQgUzDn+W2gPaRmSKt3W3ytmeVck5aXF nwdL91Hu7owg6CJQRHbazaRqKWe3H1lQBelYowNQ+jvamm2FfZHAlhVRA3XgCf8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=vJA1Tz qa5jnuOPlYRPSRVYq5hXmxrB/8hsVY5dCriyCyjJLQ3RtbpUK2Imt2WG0jKFUCtJ l9oq7UuvmMogEe2S2dhNi7TLTinu8A+DhXgt4CJWaPpgn3c73whTq95hw9Dvvxq0 2fQBCxqZjX9+KeVyOTkBKi3TD7n8yM4xrB5Ro= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2517A515A; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 10:21:48 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8A5DC5157; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 10:21:46 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87vcy2mo8j.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Mon, 25 Apr 2011 15:53:16 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 5AF7B4D8-6F47-11E0-BD69-E8AB60295C12-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 64.74.157.62 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:12342 Archived-At: On Mon 25 Apr 2011 15:53, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > Attached are 3 tests: one for Mark=E2=80=99s bug, and two for #32436. o/~ did you ever know that you're my heeee-roooo o/~ > Currently they all pass, but =E2=80=98test-scm-spawn-thread=E2=80=99 hits= a libgc > assertion failure (=E2=80=9CDuplicate large block deallocation=E2=80=9D) = once every 5 > runs or so: I guess we disable this one then? That code always seemed a little fishy to me: /* Ensure the signal handling thread has been launched, because we might = be shutting it down. */ scm_i_ensure_signal_delivery_thread (); Perhaps we can avoid spawning a thread in the key destructor. Andy --=20 http://wingolog.org/