From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel,gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: racing srfi-18 threads Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:58:44 +0100 Message-ID: References: <2e6d10880911060129s538fab2cv84805475450f33d0@mail.gmail.com> <2e6d10880911060652g56092de3g649c540e54102c05@mail.gmail.com> <87bpjcy4bc.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87skceglog.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1258488650 20038 80.91.229.12 (17 Nov 2009 20:10:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:10:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org, Development , Guile, Tristan Colgate To: Neil Jerram Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 17 21:10:43 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NAUNu-0002zX-K7 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:10:42 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37202 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NAUNt-0006Ph-Ua for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:10:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NAUC1-0004xI-80 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:58:25 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NAUBw-0004uR-Md for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:58:24 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56134 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NAUBw-0004uK-Cq; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:58:20 -0500 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:56943 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NAUBv-0002n4-Vn; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:58:20 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD40D9FE3D; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:58:19 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=BSRoN0Im0jVD7uLFX6GXG3i+d64=; b=CntVgm 17t8vv3Q7xenwH3+wdbEUorrZ8z5YenswqqslZGbPUioBD+ubNZv6L/VF4BcVsAr ZXpzetB8jYqxQiK2IwPlPCmgMpeotMnxPHSfsKliQiPeXmMBzBgs8ceKqYOpujJ5 SUSoQ6+ceTvO3oKtnnv0/39DIyJ+qAqkOyW4g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=k2g0Lz01WkSxXJBUW9daFQLA0YrmDfhJ y+WdRYmwmVghuGx79hY9PjCZOD/FcwuSK710+YrdxIDNfFfQPMo68oOCjzCQ1JGT u65fIIs4snZ9J+EcYpk4EQaC2B1r+0OEsG8NJh/sqoT2m8Pw+3E1ZJn7e39wlCFP HkXGyAbj2zM= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DDFA9FE39; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:58:16 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from unquote (unknown [79.156.144.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 10FE89FE37; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:58:11 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87skceglog.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> (Neil Jerram's message of "Mon, 16 Nov 2009 22:16:31 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 8BC6ED6C-D3B3-11DE-9F66-EF34BBB5EC2E-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:9687 gmane.lisp.guile.user:7492 Archived-At: On Mon 16 Nov 2009 23:16, Neil Jerram writes: > It seems that when run under the VM, (thunk? thunk) => #f. Ugly. Thanks for debugging this, Neil. > Andy / Ludo, can it be correct for (program-arities PROGRAM) to be #f > ? Well... no, I don't think so. Looks like a bug to me. > Thanks, Thank you! Andy -- http://wingolog.org/