From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: SRFI-1 in Scheme Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 09:41:45 +0200 Message-ID: References: <8739vocnr0.fsf@gnu.org> <87hbk3uj8c.fsf@gnu.org> <87sk3nt326.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1279093169 25271 80.91.229.12 (14 Jul 2010 07:39:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 07:39:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 14 09:39:24 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OYwYr-00018N-6b for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 09:39:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56795 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OYwYq-0005zt-1i for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 03:39:20 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=51337 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OYwYa-0005yH-Uw for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 03:39:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OYwYZ-00083K-Kv for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 03:39:04 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:44380 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OYwYZ-00083C-Ht; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 03:39:03 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEDFAC45C6; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 03:39:02 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=7k0aYQ27ubE5 0gzM2C6uEcgKgRo=; b=fi63z01sA7Pb5OUaODo7bWfbPHwZ5fAOHyw5csZ/jy7P AS01AZ3jrNKXTRFqMKS/5Dk7xlR+1wioAOHGh0++cYCqPDnYLPo0yH05oFUa11pA YAUJnpnUAm3HtUTKqRPjMvNPRn/WwIyjlimPlx8Gw6lOIM2Fpo+JXrdtrJxdX+o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=wstuLg pzjKv9rlp1xhWD9i9iIN5fUUPPZjvNE6QN7iLX/43Q2MFNzKQGUyeYcesTuhYsTD 58XM2AWk2v7F6C0pajfgJO/Xy9FDOp8Vh9LaaimutHx7PF5vqH1Kog+VoHezxMyH 2T/DvNHjwGz+jeOY11DNyK0YG5fI5YJLvnGRo= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABB87C45C5; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 03:39:01 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [83.44.191.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1A03DC45C3; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 03:38:59 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87sk3nt326.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Wed, 14 Jul 2010 00:44:17 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: DEF27B14-8F1A-11DF-B165-9056EE7EF46B-02397024!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:10663 Archived-At: Hi, On Wed 14 Jul 2010 00:44, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > To clarify, I=E2=80=99d enable the debug engine for interactive use, but = not for > =E2=80=98-s=E2=80=99, =E2=80=98-c=E2=80=99, and when a script is passed a= s an argument (analogous to > what 1.8 does with the evaluators.) I agree in principle, but I think the switching VMs bit is not fully baked yet, and so we should not recommend multiple VMs in 2.0. I would prefer to keep the situation as it is now, for 2.0. Andy --=20 http://wingolog.org/