From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: source-location->source-properties Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 23:15:27 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1877026923.880808.1290087063603.JavaMail.root@zmbs1.inria.fr> <8739qyz534.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1290291283 3875 80.91.229.12 (20 Nov 2010 22:14:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 22:14:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 20 23:14:37 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PJvhY-0001BB-EZ for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 23:14:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57087 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PJvei-0004g5-3h for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 17:11:36 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=50119 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PJvef-0004fp-BN for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 17:11:34 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PJvee-0002N1-1l for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 17:11:33 -0500 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:49663 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PJved-0002Mx-SM; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 17:11:32 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A7932B10; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 17:11:42 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=b5Vc6ttk5MV1 CxNgeI2zEUg355g=; b=MllaAuWF4P4vGzkmmFcQAgyC2YJXO58tOPdzF56wyQi3 nmmo8gzxPHjFCKs2q3tkwmz0uAI8URL6DyoiwqIgMfVfOBygCSkX8KQEj0Tt88gS 8YqgBXBDsedLJFJm8HOzSbLldZ9L9miZYDbAXKw1U+qmFYFcL5fYAr47m4e6Bgg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=sS9ItQ xisHE1tlyeT/7Y/UMG8UV1yRwrJ5NoAmoeog+Pn0Jk3U05XIlfRbiZz7CX9ukDoL l7HiDtIN6bwLx6nzyyYpG9w96BInPcZO29QQJEfRRs4JmM13Fz0kmbRs1ciAw4dZ HORJaBu4VGywItPY24yqi4AialT6o80Ex74Sc= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79A982B0F; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 17:11:41 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [88.0.167.219]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D3F022B0E; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 17:11:39 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <8739qyz534.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Thu, 18 Nov 2010 22:37:03 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 271949A2-F4F3-11DF-B8FC-B53272ABC92C-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:11175 Archived-At: Hello :) On Thu 18 Nov 2010 22:37, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > Hi! Hey I'm caught up to this week! :) > "Andy Wingo" writes: > >> + source-location->source-properties > > I was thinking that this procedure could be made internal to the ES > compiler, so that the export list of (system base lalr) remains > identical to that upstream. Well, we could. It just seemed like something other compiler writers might want, so I put it here. Is it important that we have exactly the same set of exports as upstream, or is a compatible set sufficient? I'm happy to move it, but I would like to come to some shared understanding of how to deal with external projects in Guile. Andy --=20 http://wingolog.org/