From: Neil Jerram <neil@ossau.uklinux.net>
Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: New syntax: (: MODULE-NAME VARIABLE-NAME)
Date: 15 Nov 2003 19:22:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3llqhxwrl.fsf@laruns.ossau.uklinux.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <874qx5slpw.fsf@zagadka.ping.de>
>>>>> "Marius" == Marius Vollmer <mvo@zagadka.de> writes:
Marius> Neil Jerram <neil@ossau.uklinux.net> writes:
>> OK. One other specification query: will `:' only work if the relevant
>> binding is exported?
Marius> Yes, I think that's more disciplined.
For most uses I agree, but what about debugging (or introspection)
code, where it might be useful to say things like
(break! (: (ice-9 whatnot) internal-proc))
where internal-proc is not exported. Obviously a `:'-like macro for
non-exported bindings could be implemented separately (I think it just
needs resolve-module instead of resolve-interface), but I wonder if
it's worth designing an interface now that neatly covers both
possibilities.
For example:
(: MOD-NAME VAR-NAME) -> look up from exported bindings only
(: MOD-NAME VAR-NAME internal) -> look up from all bindings
Regards,
Neil
_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-15 19:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-13 18:12 New syntax: (: MODULE-NAME VARIABLE-NAME) Marius Vollmer
2003-11-13 19:47 ` Neil Jerram
2003-11-13 20:58 ` Marius Vollmer
2003-11-14 21:04 ` Neil Jerram
2003-11-15 15:19 ` Marius Vollmer
2003-11-15 19:22 ` Neil Jerram [this message]
2003-11-16 17:31 ` Marius Vollmer
2003-11-16 18:20 ` Neil Jerram
2003-11-16 18:38 ` Neil Jerram
2003-11-16 20:36 ` Marius Vollmer
2003-11-17 20:18 ` Neil Jerram
2003-11-17 21:34 ` Marius Vollmer
2003-11-16 20:28 ` Marius Vollmer
2003-11-14 22:09 ` Mikael Djurfeldt
2003-11-15 15:10 ` Marius Vollmer
2003-11-17 2:00 ` Mikael Djurfeldt
2003-11-17 14:41 ` Marius Vollmer
2003-11-16 8:02 ` Dirk Herrmann
2003-11-17 14:44 ` New syntax (@ MODULE-NAME VARIABLE-NAME) committed Marius Vollmer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3llqhxwrl.fsf@laruns.ossau.uklinux.net \
--to=neil@ossau.uklinux.net \
--cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).