From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] R6RS-style block comments Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 21:33:33 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87hbx0sb35.fsf@delenn.lan> <87tyyi6t6c.fsf@gnu.org> <877hvaq8gf.fsf@delenn.lan> <878wfppkyu.fsf@delenn.lan> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1254858608 21718 80.91.229.12 (6 Oct 2009 19:50:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 19:50:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , guile-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas Rottmann Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 06 21:49:58 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MvG2b-0005lo-DC for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2009 21:49:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55757 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MvG2a-0006KA-UW for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2009 15:49:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MvG2W-0006Gv-8F for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2009 15:49:40 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MvG2R-000679-31 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2009 15:49:39 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58617 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MvG2Q-00066o-S6 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2009 15:49:34 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:45854 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MvG2L-0003JD-HW; Tue, 06 Oct 2009 15:49:29 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27C3F6D168; Tue, 6 Oct 2009 15:49:28 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=UDw3p4zIgaJgu0nvsDEbaTaZmag=; b=Mwq4/G //h3p4fYxUdoof4rHzev3Q1n9rljRfssGObDZwRrNNHpDNSPRE/NUExd3P0Cpp/A lAzaOIIeJBC31wUHXkG7elL+wiVTPjsed5qOSnVhlmXI+uWp3Gj20gWFRi11DUv6 /6Dzb9LiTpJ6lHKQLt75o/3hl0gEO20Ulk7/Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=RumM99j7N/0BE7HHtFSPalvsldsgaNmz OTycwy35j6Ie3vfvXB4H/v4SbRmAYbZrWXmkPeCIAXKo2SvB8zDWYVTPDQ9juWze qbn10t2o3MA3V1BRmodliR1ojcqbACIaSYQpiu1PFbEYKWs7rMXXLarfbR+sEAfI 7QhkLGVciVA= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AD656D167; Tue, 6 Oct 2009 15:49:26 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote (unknown [83.32.66.29]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BF8266D166; Tue, 6 Oct 2009 15:49:22 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <878wfppkyu.fsf@delenn.lan> (Andreas Rottmann's message of "Mon, 05 Oct 2009 23:52:25 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 5A342A76-B2B1-11DE-8635-1000076EA04E-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:9448 Archived-At: On Mon 05 Oct 2009 23:52, Andreas Rottmann writes: > I just noticed that the patch breaks "reader.test", as that hardcodes > the message exception message format string (eeew!) -- if you apply that > patch, you might want to change that string as well. Oh man, at some point we have some pain coming, switching to srfi-35/r6rs exceptions. We mentioned it in August and decided to punt indefinitely -- though should someone be interested, help would be welcome ;-) A -- http://wingolog.org/