From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs,gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: UTF-8 regression in guile 1.9.5 Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 11:29:22 +0100 Message-ID: References: <3ae3aa420912061043y12a33f27ia3d2c298812ee358@mail.gmail.com> <437145.81403.qm@web37905.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <3ae3aa420912061133r3d2fb5b4w2b3ea31f3d05e701@mail.gmail.com> <600066.28581.qm@web37908.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <3ae3aa420912061243nfb7f54cv1fd14950849b67fe@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1260532473 4869 80.91.229.12 (11 Dec 2009 11:54:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 11:54:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-guile@gnu.org, Guile Development , Mike Gran To: linasvepstas@gmail.com Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 11 12:54:25 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NJ44k-0004xE-NW for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:54:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54044 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NJ44k-0006n1-Jc for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 06:54:22 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NJ44f-0006lb-Gc for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 06:54:17 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NJ44a-0006iP-Ri for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 06:54:17 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58448 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NJ44a-0006iA-Jq; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 06:54:12 -0500 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:36303 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NJ44Y-0007an-Ik; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 06:54:11 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA45DA5054; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 06:54:08 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=cevGI4EzNOmXyEBgCr7QIK4b5TU=; b=qRa5DA FlR48iBlloom4zOVk7O+7PP8tpJJ6/0h2SExEu7l+uZYCp69NW/LqrzkSq6maYd6 t/iBRpAnmuef3ujaiDFbD0wgmSbm3SFagIyReXK7TAY88cf/LG7oP7DNj8/cQJHn 7nj9MvMiRUJueFqwrt9T5LjqE//bkNBpjx6mg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=Hhkrw1H5gJfVXc+UNMFTU0M29qRlRYnk K1gkZnKbVRi6b6NQPXVpxgp6KMagdDdaZp9qMmb6hUCNFNtHLhfF08EnWdKfe9Ev XPWcfOO/qDi2VuCTpvV0CEY1idDV/1aeZcPpFHiIcJiHXepR1N+jGrCn1v1r4lit dGeJ9QKZjig= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CE68A5053; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 06:54:05 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from unquote (unknown [83.36.163.136]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AC629A5047; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 06:53:59 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <3ae3aa420912061243nfb7f54cv1fd14950849b67fe@mail.gmail.com> (Linas Vepstas's message of "Sun, 6 Dec 2009 14:43:46 -0600") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: E1FB261C-E64B-11DE-81DB-B34DBBB5EC2E-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:4388 gmane.lisp.guile.devel:9753 Archived-At: Hi, On Sun 06 Dec 2009 21:43, Linas Vepstas writes: > 2009/12/6 Mike Gran : >> >>> > need to call (setlocale LC_ALL "") >> >> But for Guile to store characters as codepoints, declaring a locale >> pretty much a requirement now. > > Would it make sense to add (setlocale LC_ALL "") to some default, > e.g. boot-9.scm ? Mike I admit I don't follow this completely. Does Linas' suggestion make sense? I somehow thought that locales would magically just work. Cheers, Andy -- http://wingolog.org/