From: Andy Wingo <wingo@pobox.com>
To: Neil Jerram <neil@ossau.uklinux.net>
Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix hanging of popen.test
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 13:57:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3lj9a2ue9.fsf@unquote.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <874ogfrnqf.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> (Neil Jerram's message of "Sun, 04 Jul 2010 21:33:27 +0100")
Hi,
On Sun 04 Jul 2010 22:33, Neil Jerram <neil@ossau.uklinux.net> writes:
> Andy Wingo <wingo@pobox.com> writes:
>
>> This has been an on-and-off issue:
>> 02fcbf78b27788c03563e5c3d297a4cd469ce562, and
>> 04af4c4c5221c082905d52eb5ad3829ed681d097.
>
> Right. The commit (4f99a499197b592a9a3060de2205531852f4f94) that
> Patrick McCarty identified (with git bisect) is another very similar
> case.
I think I fixed this one again.
> The general problem is that any #:use-module or (@ ...) that indirectly
> pulls in srfi-1, in any code that is run as part of Guile startup, will
> cause the build to fail when doing the snarf-check-and-output-texi,
> because libguile-srfi-srfi-13-14-v-4 hasn't been built at that point.
>
> But if the developer concerned happens to have a compatible
> libguile-srfi-srfi-13-14-v-4 and libguile installed in /usr/lib or
> /usr/local/lib, the build may pick those up and so mask the problem.
>
> Is there a reason why we don't just move all the SRFI C code into the
> core libguile? I think that would be a general fix.
I agree. They should probably still be their own shlibs, but built at
the same time as libguile. Then we make snarf-check-and-output-texi
depend on the libs being built, as necessary.
Though I would hope that with time we can remove the need for these
shlibs, instead mostly implementing srfis in scheme, and using the
dynamic FFI as needed...
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-17 11:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-10 22:54 [PATCH] Fix hanging of popen.test Neil Jerram
2010-06-11 19:48 ` Neil Jerram
2010-06-14 21:27 ` Andy Wingo
2010-06-28 21:48 ` Neil Jerram
2010-06-29 9:31 ` Andy Wingo
2010-06-29 19:11 ` Neil Jerram
2010-06-30 22:50 ` Neil Jerram
2010-06-30 23:58 ` Neil Jerram
2010-07-01 10:48 ` Andy Wingo
2010-07-01 20:29 ` Patrick McCarty
2010-07-03 22:17 ` Ludovic Courtès
2010-07-04 9:07 ` Andy Wingo
2010-07-04 20:33 ` Neil Jerram
2010-07-06 21:35 ` Ludovic Courtès
2010-07-17 11:57 ` Andy Wingo [this message]
2010-07-17 18:08 ` Patrick McCarty
2010-07-01 16:22 ` dsmich
2010-07-01 21:22 ` Neil Jerram
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3lj9a2ue9.fsf@unquote.localdomain \
--to=wingo@pobox.com \
--cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=neil@ossau.uklinux.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).