From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: define-inlinable Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 18:56:43 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87wrjglvsq.fsf@gmx.at> <1301766148-20242-1-git-send-email-a.rottmann@gmx.at> <1301766148-20242-4-git-send-email-a.rottmann@gmx.at> <87pqp1zh9s.fsf@gmx.at> <874o6btuuf.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <878vvngj9m.fsf@gmx.at> <87pqoz2f3a.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1302573401 1244 80.91.229.12 (12 Apr 2011 01:56:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 01:56:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 12 03:56:37 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from [140.186.70.17] (helo=lists.gnu.org) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q9SqH-00064p-7i for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 03:56:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37593 helo=lists2.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q9SqG-00082G-Sr for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 21:56:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:39639) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q9Sls-0005yQ-Qb for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 21:52:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q9KPU-00018S-Hs for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 12:56:21 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:32978 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q9KPU-00018O-FV; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 12:56:20 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E0654530; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 12:58:18 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=YbDRtzmazdZx uAKMQKqmZCrix8Q=; b=g2vRgYnICc76Xcuc/n8uK1olRIdthmCJsy4gFyW05kpW xn/mStZrmQhbIwoK/uFu11hpZXBg7Hz4SC6VI9+Ya7DDa+VnG70aFCU2txmjl4xu nPMMahidu/rc1vM6cvqfiZGQ3pukM9BU98zCYodzmSdcRBe4daao7Badsfm+0cA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=awjEg9 22e5Obgl9QUOHwSHfIl6XyiZSsn7gvX47SuVqfwmmelnu8Msaj0muWy+knQqnXMc qrT5rCzoH7UZyt6AxMng2s8d50U6gLbLtdLOG/ZvcTcBpMJomSJrMwXesInBP5c+ 1qafcJSPut9zjLx3p8rOG5RPePi+GOJICdaSc= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7354C452C; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 12:58:15 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 924D54510; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 12:58:12 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87pqoz2f3a.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Thu, 07 Apr 2011 00:24:25 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: E475171E-645C-11E0-BD1F-E8AB60295C12-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 64.74.157.62 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-Broken-Reverse-DNS: no host name found for IP address 140.186.70.17 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:12218 Archived-At: On Thu 07 Apr 2011 00:24, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: >> Updated patch attached, is it OK to push this way? > > Yes, please go ahead! FWIW: Running r6rs-arithmetic-flonums.test ERROR: r6rs-arithmetic-flonums.test: fixnum->flonum: simple - arguments: ((= wrong-type-arg #f "Wrong type to apply: ~S" (#)= (#))) In practice this means that anyone that compiled something that uses fixnum? against Guile 2.0.0 now has broken code. I don't know if this is important, as R6RS users probably have lots of other carnage to deal with, but it is strictly an ABI break. Andy --=20 http://wingolog.org/