* Re: PATCH: scheme-modules.texi (2)
[not found] <20030829092725.T1440@netdot.net>
@ 2003-08-29 20:51 ` Neil Jerram
2003-08-29 22:20 ` Kevin Ryde
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Neil Jerram @ 2003-08-29 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: guile-devel
>>>>> "Aaron" == Aaron VanDevender <sig@netdot.net> writes:
Aaron> I found a couple of mistakes in my original scheme-modules.texi
Aaron> patch, so here is a newer version. [...]
Thanks; this looks good, but I'm not sure what to do with it because
the 1.6.x and 1.7.x versions of the manual are out of sync here.
Kevin/Marius - any idea what the current position is on resolving such
differences?
Neil
_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: PATCH: scheme-modules.texi (2)
2003-08-29 20:51 ` PATCH: scheme-modules.texi (2) Neil Jerram
@ 2003-08-29 22:20 ` Kevin Ryde
2003-08-30 19:35 ` Neil Jerram
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Ryde @ 2003-08-29 22:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: guile-devel, Aaron VanDevender
Neil Jerram <neil@ossau.uklinux.net> writes:
>
> Kevin/Marius - any idea what the current position is on resolving such
> differences?
Myself I'd only been putting fixes for errors of fact into the 1.6
branch, and confining new stuff and tweaks to the head.
(I don't think I've been fiddling with scheme-modules.texi as such.)
_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: PATCH: scheme-modules.texi (2)
2003-08-29 22:20 ` Kevin Ryde
@ 2003-08-30 19:35 ` Neil Jerram
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Neil Jerram @ 2003-08-30 19:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: guile-devel
>>>>> "Kevin" == Kevin Ryde <user42@zip.com.au> writes:
Kevin> Neil Jerram <neil@ossau.uklinux.net> writes:
>>
>> Kevin/Marius - any idea what the current position is on resolving such
>> differences?
Kevin> Myself I'd only been putting fixes for errors of fact into the 1.6
Kevin> branch, and confining new stuff and tweaks to the head.
That's the approach I've previously taken too. However, since the 1.6
branch is still running, and 1.6 currently has nothing on
load-extension, it seems worthwhile to me to apply Aaron's patch to
1.6. We can decide how to resolve 1.6 vs 1.8 differences later.
So I'll apply this.
Neil
_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-08-30 19:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20030829092725.T1440@netdot.net>
2003-08-29 20:51 ` PATCH: scheme-modules.texi (2) Neil Jerram
2003-08-29 22:20 ` Kevin Ryde
2003-08-30 19:35 ` Neil Jerram
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).